Northern | US

Commission twist in Eben Etzebeth saga


Springboks lock Eben Etzebeth (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

There was a dramatic twist in the ongoing saga involving veteran Springbok lock Eben Etzebeth and a brawl in Langebaan.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the eve of the team’s departure for the World Cup in Japan, Etzebeth appeared before the Human Rights Commission to answer questions related to the incident at the West Coast town at the weekend.

The accusations against Etzebeth – based on a grainy and dark video that shows very little – suggested he had assaulted a member of the public. It was alleged that Etzebeth‚ who was with members of his family and friends‚ also made racial slurs.

On Sunday there were swift calls from a political group, the Khoisan Defiance Campaign, for the Springbok to be axed and arrested for assault. Another statement was released by the group on Tuesday.

Despite the fallout over the incident, Bok coach Rassie Erasmus backed the lock and included Etzebeth in his squad for the World Cup. The team is due to leave for Japan on Friday.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

Speaking at the team’s departure media briefing, Erasmus confirmed the lock appeared in front of the HRC on Thursday. He reiterated again that he still believes the player’s version of the events.

“There is always a coach-player relationship and there is always trust in that,” said Erasmus. “There are a lot of this said on social media, not just about Eben, but a lot of things we have to handle daily. We just ignore because it is just nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This has become a real big thing. I have to believe what the player tells me. Until something else is proven differently, only then can we act.

“The update I can give you, which I only heard this morning, is that there was a complaint at the HRC. Eben and Eugene (Henning) our player affairs manager is there – in discussion with the Human Right Commission this afternoon. “There is no police or anything else that we have heard of. We have only heard of the complaint at the HRC.”

A South African Rugby statement, issued shortly after 3am on Friday morning, also confirmed that Etzebeth met with the Human Rights Commission in Johannesburg on Thursday. “The purpose of the meeting was to advise the player of the role the HRC takes in relation to a complaint received, as well as the subsequent media reports relating to it, and to establish a commitment of cooperation between the two parties,” the statement said.

“Both parties expressed their satisfaction with the envisaged process going forward and concluded by describing the meeting as constructive. The player denied any wrongdoing to the HRC and has pledged his full cooperation in the matter.”

ADVERTISEMENT

rugby365.com

WATCH: The RugbyPass stadium guide to Shizuoka, one of the grounds that will host the Springboks during the  pool stage of the World Cup in Japan

Video Spacer

Stream Nations Championship 2026 LIVE

Hemispheres collide in the new Nations Championship. Stream live, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV.

Watch on RPTV
Starts 4th July 2026 - USA only.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close