Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Brian O'Driscoll gives withering France assessment and makes bold prediction

By Josh Raisey
Brian O'Driscoll. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Irish legend Brian O’Driscoll has said that Italy will beat France this weekend if they play the way they did against the Irish.

ADVERTISEMENT

Italy have succumbed to losses to Wales and Ireland in Rome so far this Six Nations, but have made a good account of themselves in both matches, as they were defensively resolute, and troubled the opposition with ball in hand. With the French in disarray currently, O’Driscoll believes that Italy can beat their neighbours if they play at the standard they have been.

Speaking on ‘Off The Ball’, the 133-cap Ireland international said that this is a ‘huge, huge game’ for Italy coach Conor O’Shea, hoping to win his first Six Nations match with Italy. In truth, there could not be a better opportunity than now, with a beleaguered French team that looks incapable of functioning. Les Bleus have been poor for so long that it seems very unlikely that they will be able to bounce back from their forlorn performance against the Irish on Sunday.

With that said, O’Driscoll said that a loss to Italy could well spell the end of coach Jacques Brunel’s tenure with the national team. Brunel has endured a horrendous spell at the helm of France, overseeing just four wins in 18 matches. After dismissing Guy Noves for a similar record, many expected him to be gone after the England match, however, he salvaged some pride with a win over Scotland. Nonetheless, it is a very real possibility that he may be sacked, even with the World Cup only months away.

With such a disparity between the players that France have at their disposal and the team’s performances, it is no surprise that O’Driscoll believes this could be the end for Brunel if they lose. However, the only saving grace for the French is that they lost to Italy in this game eight years ago, with manager Marc Lievremont under immense pressure as well. He stayed in the job and France went on to make the World Cup final later that year, and came agonisingly close to winning. However, this year, it seems impossible that Brunel could repeat that feat.

You may also like: Joe Schmidt and Rory Best speak after France win and look ahead to Wales

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search