Northern | US

Blues halfback criticized in first 2025 Super Rugby Pacific victory


Finlay Christie. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Comments
20 Comments

Impressive second-half performances from Beauden Barrett and Mark Telea gave the Blues their first Super Rugby Pacific victory of the 2025 season, overcoming a tough Hurricanes side in Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

The game went back and forth in the second half, before a sensational late try from All Blacks winger Mark Telea put the Blues leading margin out to four with 11 minutes to go in Wellington.

The Blues scored the first try of the evening after referee Angus Gardner awarded a penalty try for the Blues.

The automatic seven points for the Blues came off the back of a powerful scrum by Vern Cotter’s forward pack.

Related

Despite the Blues finding a way to pull off an important victory in the context of their 2025 season, Super Rugby fans were critical of Blues halfback Finlay Christie’s performance, who was substituted with 15 minutes to go by Sam Nock.

Nock then set up the next try, firing a short pass to Hoskins Sotutu who crashed over close to the line.

Fans on social media have been disappointed with Christie’s performance in Wellington, further questioning his future in the All Blacks under Scott Robertson.

ADVERTISEMENT

Halfback has long been a position of depth for the All Blacks, which in the last year has grown even more with the likes of Noah Hotham and Cortez Ratima performing at the international level in 2024.

Christie hasn’t represented the All Blacks since the July home series against England in 2024, as TJ Perenara, Hotham and Ratima were preferred over Christie for the end-of-year Northern Tour.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

20 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Ben 15 minutes ago
What Rennie wants the most from the tour to South Africa and Springboks Test series

Let me try it from this angle – and I already know it’s doomed to fail, since a linguist, comms guy and published author apparently has nothing to teach a guy in the comments about semantics.

Even if a man’s intentions are pure and another man has somehow divined his true intentions, or more likely, simply taken him at his word, his word choices may still objectively betray semantic undertones. Word don’t only have meaning, they carry strategic intent, and together with a host of contextual hints such as behaviour, are meant to achieve certain outcomes. In his case, it’s about contesting matches off the field, in media interviews, among the fan base and pundits, in player behaviour, etc. Normal competition stuff, but some things are off limits or Zinedine Zidane will headbutt a yo-mama taunter in the chest, or a guy in the comments will call behaviour out. Call it micro-agressions, and you have summed up corporate culture and right-wing behaviour (e.g. dead naming, misnaming, short-shrifting, exclusion/inclusion, dominance-establishing, shaming, othering and all the other tools of mass coercion that fall under the banner of “leadership” and “competition”). Observed over time, those add up to a body of evidence, a truer indication of intentions than hollow assurances and their uncritical acceptance. No big deal but leave my country, religion and mama “out your mouth”.



...

42 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close