Northern | US

'It’s not like we’re a million miles away': Leo Cullen on the growing gap

Bilbao , Spain - 23 May 2026; Leinster head coach Leo Cullen during the Investec Champions Cup final match between Leinster and Union Bordeaux Bégles at San Mamés Stadium in Bilbao, Spain. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
Comments
10 Comments

Two days on from Leinster’s defeat, Leo Cullen’s assessment of Bordeaux following the Champions Cup final reads less like frustration and more like blunt admiration for a side operating at a level his own team couldn’t quite match.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is a growing school of thought – not least given the nature of Saturday’s final – that French sides are pulling away at the top end of this European competition. Six titles in a row have hardened that view, and for Leinster, beaten again by Top 14 opposition, it’s no longer a throwaway narrative but a recurring theme that’s hard to ignore.

However, Cullen doesn’t think Leinster are that far off the pace, despite a painful 41-19 scoreline.

VIDEO

“They’re just that split-second quicker than we were, and very, very clinical,” he said. “They’ve been doing that to a lot of teams over the course of the last couple of seasons.

“They’re just that little bit better than us today,” he said. “But it’s not like we’re a million miles away.

“I know there’s a decent gap in the scoreline today, but that will be reflected upon… the big thing is how clinical Bordeaux were. You’ve got to say a massive well done to Bordeaux, because they have been insanely clinical in everything that they did,” he said.

“Scoring five tries in the first half… we’ve lots of possession during the day, lots of territory during the day, but we’re just nowhere near clinical with what we had.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“They made us pay. They made us really pay.”

The detail he kept circling back to was what happens in the loose, moments that decide finals.

“Broken balls, scraps, are such a big part of the game,” he said. “I think they were just a good second quicker, unfortunately.”

Cullen was quick to give Bordeaux their flowers, acknowledging that Leinster weren’t the first side UBB have put to the sword in this fashion.

“They’ve been doing that to a lot of teams over the last couple of seasons. They were favourites for a reason, weren’t they?”

And more broadly, Cullen pointed to the environment shaping that sharpness.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The speed of the way they do things is very impressive,” he said. “It’s a competition we watch a lot. I personally watch it a lot. There’s great intrigue. They’re playing big battles every week, full stadiums.”

“You see the way Bordeaux play as well.  It’s things done at speed.”

For Leinster, there was no mystery in the gap – only the need to close it.

“That’s the bit for us to reflect on and try to get better.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
G
GM 134 days ago

Many of the UBB elements identified by Cullen also apply to the way the Canes are playing. Hope they can go all the way too, because it’s great to see a winning formula which is also a wonderful spectacle.

T
TheNotoriousFig 135 days ago

I don’t know if he’s right. There is something missing but it is unclear from here what it is. That game was a bunch of ‘ifs and maybes’ and UBB made their own luck with much faster line speed and much more variety in attack. Smart coaching, great players and a pack that never stepped back. Leinster were not nearly sharp enough.

E
Ed the Duck 135 days ago

“much faster line speed and much more variety in attack. Smart coaching, great players and a pack that never stepped back”


Kinda answered your own question on what’s missing figgy…

S
SB 135 days ago

With the squad he has at his disposal, they should never be out of a game by halftime.

E
Ed the Duck 135 days ago

Exactly, UBB didn’t need to move beyond second gear after half time.

J
JPM 135 days ago

But in the same way they benefited a particularly easy half of the draw. They certainly would have lost vs Bath, Northampton or Toulouse…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 33 minutes ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close