Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England pair Ben Te'o and Billy Vunipula caught up in late night hotel drama

Billy Vunipola and Ben Te'o. (Photos/Gettys Images)

England pair Ben Te’o and Billy Vunipola have been reprimanded after breaching team protocol following England’s final round 38-all draw with Scotland, according to reports by The Guardian.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pair arrived late back at the hotel in the early hours of Sunday morning following a night out following the second-half nightmare at Twickenham. Their late arrival back at the Chiswick base was followed by unruly behaviour that upset those in the vicinity.

England do not have a curfew but players must return together after leaving the hotel.

The RFU has dealt with the matter internally, with Te’o offering an apology to the team.

Eddie Jones has taken a hardline approach to off-field behaviour within the England squad. After Manu Tuilagi and Denny Solomona returned to the team hotel at 4 am following a drinking session in 2017 both players were sent home from the training camp. They were both omitted for the next training camp by Jones.

Flyhalf Danny Cipriani has not been seen since his England recall last June after he was involved and arrested in, an altercation at a nightclub in August. On that occasion, Cipriani faced a disciplinary hearing from the RFU after bringing the game into disrepute.

Te’o and Vunipola’s incident is far less serious but what line of action Jones takes with them remains to be seen. Vunipola featured in his first Six Nations since 2017 after a horror run of injuries, dealing with three arm fractures in 12 months. He started all five matches and was an integral part of England’s return to form. Te’o, however, started just once against Italy as Jones settled into his new midfield combination of Manu Tuilagi and Henry Slade.

Eddie Jones frustrated by mental lapses:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks Sevens playmaker whose name is now next to Jonah Lomu and Christian Cullen All Blacks Sevens playmaker named HK's best
Search