Barrett: The 'non-negotiable' aspect the All Blacks must front up on
All Blacks lock Scott Barrett says his side must deliver a more physical performance if they are to withstand Fiji’s powerful forward pack in Hamilton this weekend.
They All Blacks have been the subject of plenty of criticism this week after they were outmuscled at the breakdown and in the collision zone in last week’s 57-23 victory over the Flying Fijians in Dunedin.
While the scoreline reads a 34-point win for the All Blacks, Ian Foster’s men were put under a heap of pressure throughout the test match at Forsyth Barr Stadium as the Fijians outshone their Kiwi counterparts up front.
Whether it was a bone-crunching tackle or a clutch piece of defending to pilfer the ball on their own tryline, Fiji came up trumps from a physicality standpoint for the first 60 minutes of the match.
That, in part, allowed them to stay just eight points astray from the All Blacks heading into the final 20 minutes of the game before a lack of conditioning, as a result of quarantine restrictions, and New Zealand’s bench options blew the scoreline open.
Much has since been made about Fiji’s prowess at the breakdown, and Barrett made it clear that’s an area of which his side need to improve on if they want to avoid another fright at FMG Stadium Waikato this Saturday.
“You guys are probably well aware, there’s been a lot of talk about the breakdown,” Barrett, who was rested for last week’s match, told media on Tuesday.
“I think every test fixture that the All Blacks come in, teams are going to be coming at us, especially up front. The physicality is a non-negotiable of test rugby and All Blacks rugby, so we always have to front up there and we’re well aware of that.”
The 27-year-old added that there were other aspects of New Zealand’s game that needed improvement as well, most notably their option-taking with ball in hand.
The kicking game of Barrett’s brothers, first-five Beauden and fullback Jordie, have come under scrutiny in the post-mortem of last week’s match.
Ex-All Blacks wing Jeff Wilson and former Black Ferns midfielder Hannah Porter led the criticism of the playmakers’ kicking on The Breakdown earlier this week, while Sir John Kirwan called for better decision-making from midfielder Rieko Ioane.
Barrett said those weaknesses of the All Blacks’ game have been acknowledged within the camp, and the playing group are eager to make amends in those respects in three days’ time.
“All across the field, just our options and how smart we are with the ball in hand, and also our defence, how we can put teams under pressure,” the 41-test international said when asked what lessons he and his teammates had taken from last week’s match.
Barrett added the return of Brodie Retallick after an 18-month sabbatical in Japan with Top League club Kobelco Steelers will go some way to alleviating concerns about the All Blacks’ physicality.
“I’ve certainly noticed him on the training field, heavy shoulders and clean outs at the breakdown. It’s great for this group and it’s his game. He’s a physical player and a smart player as well,” Barrett said.
The All Blacks are scheduled to kick-off their second test against Fiji on Saturday at 7:05pm NZT.
Comments on RugbyPass
It was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
5 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
3 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to commentsGreat read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.
2 Go to commentsThe current AB coaching team is basically the Crusaders so it smacks of wanting their familiar leaders around. This is not a good look for the future of the ABs or the younger players in Super working their way up the player ladder. Razor is touted as innovative, forward looking but his early moves look like insecurity and insular, provincial thinking. He is the AB's coach not the Golden Oldies.
10 Go to comments