Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

All Blacks veteran rejects calls for high tackle law change in wake of Bledisloe Cup red cards

By AAP
Australia's Lachlan Swinton. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Veteran All Black Sam Whitelock, who was the victim of a clumsy shot by Wallabies rookie Lachie Swinton, has rejected calls for changes to the high tackle framework, saying it’s players who need to adjust.

ADVERTISEMENT

Swinton was rubbed out until next February – missing the remainder of the Tri-Nations plus two Super Rugby games – after he was red-carded for his hit on the All Blacks lock in the 35th minute of the Suncorp Stadium match on Saturday night.

While only making his test debut, Swinton couldn’t get his four-match ban reduced by the SANZAAR judicial committee as he had two prior offences on his record.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup IV | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup IV | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

New Zealand prop Ofa Tuungafasi was also sent off for a similar tackle on Wallabies winger Tom Wright, and is set to miss their clash with Argentina in Sydney on Saturday night.

By the letter of the law, Swinton’s tackle was a red card offence with World Rugby clamping down on hits to the head, even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders.

But some former players have called for the use of yellow cards (a 10-minute suspension) for such incidents with it to come under review post-match, leaving a send-off for pre-meditated foul play,

Whitelock, who has played 120 tests, didn’t think the law needed softening or referees to adjust their interpretation, and wanted players to play to the rules.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Personally, it doesn’t matter how it’s reffed or ruled, as long as it’s consistent from the referee and judiciary,” said Whitelock, who was sporting a black eye, although said it wasn’t from Swinton’s high tackle.

“Our job as players is to make sure we train and learn what we can and can’t do, so if it’s lowering our tackle height, if it’s wrapping our arms in a tackle, it all goes from there.

“We can’t worry about that … we’re rugby players who are out there to play rugby.”

Whitelock, 32, said he and his team had put many hours into adjusting their tackle technique after the crackdown last year.

He was supported by All Blacks assistant coach John Plumtree, who said the rules were there to ensure the safety of players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I know there’s been a bit of a noise about it after the weekend but the rules say what foul play is and we’ve got an obligation to make sure that players are safe,” Plumtree said.

“When we’re coaching our players, individually and collectively, we’re always talking about body height and making sure that in contact that we do the right thing and target the right areas.

“At times players are going to get that wrong under pressure and we saw that on the weekend.”

The Wallabies reassemble on Wednesday after some time off following their shock 24-22 win, starting preparations for their first clash with the Pumas in Newcastle on November 21.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 10 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland get major Autumn scheduling shake-up Ireland set for Friday night lights this Autumn
Search