1
NRL boss takes fierce Twitter backlash after ruling out Folau return
Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter Beattie has received a lot of criticism on Twitter after banning Israel Folau from returning to the NRL.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Australia rugby union international Folau recently posted highly controversial comments on Instagram, resulting in the imminent termination of his contract by Rugby Australia. This is following similar comments he made last year in which he was warned by his bosses. This would rule him out of playing for Australia at this year’s World Cup, and playing for the Waratahs for the rest of the season, with many expecting him to return to rugby league. However, Beattie has resoundly ruled that out.
These comments by Beattie that have caused a lot of outrage on Twitter, due to the NRL’s perceived double standards. Of course, there is a large number of fans that support this approach, but there are those that disagree in equal measure. This is because players in the NRL have been embroiled in a number of off-field controversies in recent years, and while some, like Ben Barba, have been fired, a lot have kept their jobs.
While many fans have not condoned what Folau has done, they do believe that the 73-cap Wallaby does not deserve this rebuke from Beattie, particularly in comparison to what some other players have done.
This is the reaction on Twitter:
Peter Beattie coming out saying "Folau doesn't meet our inclusion test"…. as if all the crims you've allowed to come back to, or currently play in the league passed it with flying colours ?
— Emmah ? (@EmmaH1123) April 11, 2019
Yea but those muppets have no issue with allowing lodge to play it’s ok to bash your partner snort Cocaine sexually assault women but @NRL @Todd_Greenberg draw a line in the sand to believing in your faith
— sam (@onyohead38) April 11, 2019
https://twitter.com/2143Pineapples/status/1116332766935707648
Ridiculous. Whilst the majority of people don’t agree with his comments(me included), what has he done wrong? Where as a lot of players in the nrl have committed crimes etc ?????
— Todd G (@ToddyGreaser) April 11, 2019
Gee they continue to make a joke of themselves.. wife basher come on in and play, commit crimes no problems but we will not have a code hopper ????????????
— bunniegirl (@bunniegirl43) April 11, 2019
https://twitter.com/tedbaxter99/status/1116311274789298176
https://twitter.com/darealhotsteppa/status/1116317166926569472
https://twitter.com/Hero_Gallagher/status/1116296438697402369
So he doesn't pass their 'inclusive test' but those that commit domestic violence do? ????
— Brad Kelly (@tpeezy23) April 11, 2019
Folau has already had a successful career in league during stints with the Melbourne Storm and Brisbane Broncos between 2007 and 2010. He won the NRL with the Storm (in which the team were later stripped), as well as representing the Kangaroos eight times and representing Queensland in the State of Origin.
ADVERTISEMENT
His four-year stint in rugby league came to an end when he joined Australian rules football outfit Greater Western Sydney in 2011, and playing a season in the AFL for the GWS Giants. This preceded his move to union, which may be coming to an end.
This has proven to be hugely controversial in the world of rugby, with many people attacking and defending Folau on social media. However, these comments from Beattie have also caused a stir, as some feel the 30-year-old does not deserve to be barred from the NRL.
Comments on RugbyPass
Well done Baby Boks we will take the Draw. No 9 senseless long passes in those conditions. let’s move on and hope for some good weather
3 Go to commentsHow did it end a draw. South Africa didn’t score any points as far as I can see
3 Go to commentsNo doubt this will be a fantastic occasion and I plan to be there, but I think the bean counters have won out over the rugby brains. In my opinion, it is foolhardy to give the Black Ferns the experience of playing in front of 60,000+ at Twickenham a year before they might be playing there in a World Cup Final. Better to play France at Twickenham and Black Ferns at Kingsholm. The difference in takings would be miniscule.
1 Go to commentsDom kant
193 Go to commentsBen is a little incel desperately trying to stir the pot and stay relevant. We used to get mad at his articles. Now we just feel sorry for him
193 Go to commentsPerhaps we may need to put an asterisk on NZ’s ‘87 WC win since the Boks weren’t there. You know, just as a reminder. Poor Ben Smith. Go cry somewhere else.
193 Go to commentsNz should have won. I didn't watch the game, but the ref was at fault and the bounce of the ball and the Bokke used the Bomb squad and the Bokke slow the game down and the Bokke scrum. They should remove the scrum. The Bokke are to strong. Not fair. Nz should have won
2 Go to commentsThanks for a much more balanced piece Ned and not that BS that Bin Smuth just posted a short while ago. read this article and then Bin Smuth’s and tell me there isn’t a huge difference🙄
2 Go to commentsWere the Baby Boks part of this game or did the Baby Blacks play themselves?🤔 That man Bin Smuth once again does a little write-up on the game and it is like 95% about the Baby Blacks🤣 Glad he ends off with the Baby Blacks were actually in cruise control for most of the game and weren’t actually playing for the win WTF🤣🤣 Maybe he was expecting the Baby Blacks to run rampant….
3 Go to commentsOne does not expect anything more from Ben Smith who epitomises the worst of New Zealand media arrogance and an inability to balance what he has to say about any team that beats the All Blacks. His reference to context is pathetically thin. He does not comment that Frizell deserved a red card given his blatant manipulation of his body to ensure that he could drop his body weight onto Mbonambi’s lower leg. No mention of the ball lost forward before the All Black’s try (lost in-field of the 5 metre line and gathered beyond). The All Black commitment and effort was superb and there was little in it. Given the Springbok passage to the final and the loss of their hooker in the first three minutes, their resolve and capacity to win their fourth final out of eight attempts (not three out of ten) deserves the praise that has been forthcoming from media around the world, worth reading and listening to. Ben should join his “pundit” friends on TV - he would fit in well. This sort of article reduces any credibility Rugby Pass has ever had. Why persist with this sort of nonsense? The man does his country and a rugby blog a disservice.
193 Go to commentsEtzebeth went on to say: “I would never dream of saying that systems stay in place following a change in captain. To say that would be deeply, deeply, disrespectful of Siya. A while back an Irish person told me they would be fine without Sexton, so I’m just responding to that.”
3 Go to commentsClose games are what we want to see…. What a match it was…. I am sure that everyone was drained by the end of it. The reality of it all there has to be a winner and a loser. The fact that we still talking about it is almost 6 months to the day Rugby is the winner.. Asante sana… Here is to 2027 and what it will bring out.
193 Go to commentsIt’s going to be a good game. COYQ
1 Go to comments“Shock”, the guy was casually saying he was just slightly surprised. Nowadays if you say anything it gets taken completely out of context. Calm down everyone.
156 Go to commentsAll I can say after reading this bitter, sour, sad piece is… Thank you very much! This will be read in the change room just before kick off on 31 August…
193 Go to commentsLook, we know contradicting opinions and wacky comments bring readers and clicks, so well done to RP for allowing always-wrong-Ben to say something here. However RP needs to put a disclaimer next to his comments for their own credibility. NZ was and is incapable of acknowledging their opp beating them. They refused so with Ire and with Arg in 2022 and also the Boks in 2023 x 2. Nothing Ben says here holds water, NZ attacked backwards, except when Kolisi and Kolbe was off And cyncialy took out Bongi, we played without lineouts for 75mins. Kolisi and Kurt-Lee almost scored twice. Thats 3 vs 2 for Boks, but the Boks opportunities was legal. Boks should have been 16-3 up by half time. Tacticaly the Boks attacked better defended better scrummed better (without a hooker) kicked better and crossed the whitewash more times. Boks beat Fr Eng Nz to win in 23, comeon give some credit at least. Even Federer Verstappen NY Mets, Mamoa, was able to see a great human sport achievement by the Boks and their DNA Boks #RWC27 !🏉
193 Go to commentsForget the 85kg bit, that can become something else. However I do like the one off test on ANZAC day idea. SR plays Fri/ Sat, test players travel Sunday and the squads have the full week together before playing Saturday. Rest of SR has a week off. Either involve women's teams in same location or in the other country and rotate annually. Herbert is right in that change is needed.
3 Go to commentsI’ve read loads of nonsense before but this article takes the cake. Or perhaps someone changed the date for April Fool's Day.
3 Go to commentsReally Rugbypass? Ben Smith I think you forgot what the Springboks did to the All Blacks at Twickenham 8 weeks earlier? Springboks 35 All Blacks 7. There is alot of ifs and buts in your article. The All Blacks threw the sink at the Springboks and unfortunately they were not good enough regardless if they played with 14 men or not. It was the Springboks who forced the All Blacks to make mistakes! Sorry but not Sorry the Springboks is the best ever Rugby World Cup Nation in the world. 4 Cups baby!
193 Go to commentsYou just backed the Boks with that fantastic review! Well done! Have some cake!
193 Go to comments