Northern | US

Argentina vs Springboks takes: Hanekom better than Wiese, Boks' big names flopped

Eben Etzebeth (C) and Cobus Wiese of South Africa celebrate victory at the end of the rugby union test match between Argentina and South Africa at Jose Amalfitani Stadium on August 8, 2026 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. (Photo by Marcos Brindicci/Getty Images)
Comments
39 Comments

The Springboks came away with a 17-10 win in a tense defensive showdown that featured plenty of kicking from both sides.

ADVERTISEMENT

After falling behind 10-3, the Boks struck on half-time to level proceedings heading into the sheds.

A big lift from South Africa’s bench proved to be a difference maker to secure a go-ahead try that they were able to defend for 18 minutes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Here are four takeaways from the Test in Buenos Aires.

Different Los Pumas showed up

Argentina came with defensive resolve not seen for a while in Buenos Aires, contributing to what was a gripping contest and incredibly physical Test match.

South Africa also relied on their defence which was for the most part flawless in the front line. They were only broken up the middle once on the second chance offload try early, with Pumas players unable to break one-on-one match ups for the 80 minutes.

The Bok defence stood firm to close the game out well past 80 minutes, defending for double digit phases on the last play to force an error out of the home side.

Van Staden, who came on early for Kolisi, Hanekom, and South Africa’s tight five routinely pushed Los Pumas back behind the gain line with a fast rush and bruising two-man tackles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Where Argentina found success was in the kicking game, with short stabs in behind and cross-field kicks proving a successful tactic to create half chances.

Unfortunately for the home side, they coughed up nearly every chance in the open field with frantic play.

Bottom line was the Pumas came to play and looked a lot better than they did last month in July.

Boks’ big names off the pace

The Springboks had a number of their big name players successfully return to injury in this game, but they will leave it with more concerns over Kolisi (hamstring), Esterhuizen (HIA) and the outstanding Hanekom who left late with three minutes to go.

ADVERTISEMENT

Locks Eben Etzebeth and Lood de Jager were below par with their handling and accuracy with ball-in-hand, despite anchoring the lineout & defence well.

Both made multiple errors at key stages, Etzebeth knocking on from the five and conceding a penalty by trying to leap the defence before getting isolated and pinged. De Jager through an intercept which luckily avoided costing points when Carreras penalty attempt hit the post.

André Esterhuizen was sloppy to start with multiple turnovers, but found some rhythm late in the half including creating the line break that led to the Van der Merwe try. The No.12 will now have to pass return to play protocols after leaving with a knock.

The biggest name to return, flyhalf Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, was not his normal game-breaking self. He showed flashes on attack when they took on the line, but his game management was poor, and the Pumas made extra effort to take away his time and space.

South Africa obviously locked away their plans for New Zealand, using a game plan straight out of 2019, but their stars didn’t really shine in limited roles.

They look undercooked and out of form, with players like Hanekom, Van Staden and even Paul de Villiers from July looking better than the veterans.

Hanekom better than Wiese

One man who set the pace was Bulls ace Cameron Hanekom, he was the best on field in Buenos Aires by some margin.

He has been one of the best in the URC when healthy but injury has robbed the No.8 of featuring more for the Boks.

When the Boks were under pressure early, he delivered in defence, pounding Pumas’ ball carriers backward for dominant tackles. Every carry powered through multiple defenders.

Argentina were well on top at 10-3 when Hanekom delivered at the breakdown, winning a penalty to relieve pressure in the 29th minute.

He finished with the second-most running metres with 82, delivered on 13 carries, which is exceptional for a loose forward. Those are numbers that outside backs put up with cheap metres from kick returns.

Finishing with double digit carries and double digit tackles, Hanekom was accurate on a day when errors flowed. A reliable force, the Boks leaned on him.

The 24-year-old seems better than Jasper Wiese, who is a wrecking ball in the carry game, but Hanekom seems to offer more around the park.

Jasper was left home to rest and watched Hanekom do his job better.

Boks aerial game disarmed

The effectiveness of the Springboks’ contestable kicking game in Buenos Aires was low which would have put a smile on the face of Dave Rennie.

South Africa kicked an astounding 43 times against Argentina. They weren’t able to come away with any cheap tries from high balls and for the most part, failed to challenge the catch in the air.

Los Pumas used the same retreating catcher tactic that the All Blacks have adopted with success. Many of the aimless high balls either went too long or too short from South Africa’s kickers. The high ball was a huge issue in the 43-10 loss in Wellington in 2025.

The Boks looked very much like the 2019-2023 edition, back then they would capitalise frequently from lost high balls. The change in escorting rules, leading to retreating catchers being employed by teams now, looks like it will nullify this part of the Boks’ game.

Bomb squad made a difference

Although Marco van Staden was called upon early, the rest of the bench forwards and particularly the reserve front row, provided the much-needed lift to get the Boks home in this one.

The Springboks maul showed limited effectiveness in the first half while the scrum was up-and-down, penalties went each way.

Props Gerhard Steenekamp and Zachary Porthen provided the lift they needed, while reserve hooker Jan-Hendrik Wessels came on to fuel the scrum that powered over the Pumas allowing Hanekom to score from the back.

The reserve forwards brought power in the carry game and it gave South Africa the ascendency.

 

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

39 Comments
J
Jacque 27 days ago

Rassie always knew this was gonna be a GRIND. He said that at last weeks presser with SFM.

Main thing here was to get minutes under the belt & be MATCH fit for the All Blacks.


After this weekend the Boks know more about the All Blacks “gameplan” than the All Blacks about the Boks.

T
Tooly 27 days ago

A bit early to anoint Handcom !

Lute and Eban have had long breaks they played well .

Both sides all played well . A great game .

B
Boddasaffa 28 days ago

Wouldn’t it be really balanced if Ben wrote the same about his All Blacks. Every article is just a puff piece on what someone else has said and all the negatives - plagiarism and a hack. Enjoy the comments more, the only reason you get the hits is for all the comments.

N
Ninjin 28 days ago

Well now come the opening test Neither Nz nor Sa will field the same teams. Both are up for the challange so expect the game to be played at super human levels.

B
BR 28 days ago

Why allow Ben smith to do the player ratings of a Springbok game?


1. He’s the worst

2. He’s the worst

F
Fernando 28 days ago

The Pumas' bench is unlikely to be very strong. Felipe left 21 players in Europe, who are usually part of the 34-man Rugby Championship squad, either resting or starting preseason with their clubs:

Gallo - Sclavi - Delgado - Bello

Montoya - Bernasconi

Rubiolo - Molina - Alemanno

González - Kremer - Oviedo (Joaquín) - Grondona (Santiago)

García

Albornoz

Chocobares - Picardo - Elizalde

Mallía - Carreras (Mateo) - Delguy

C
Carlos 28 days ago

Algunos andan lastimados on con demasiados minutos de juego.

C
CT 28 days ago

I don't usually agree with your trolling diatribe,however a lot of what you said is correct they were undercooked. In saying that they'll be on fire soon ; )

I
Itsallacademic 28 days ago

“The 24-year-old seems better than Jasper Wiese”


“Jasper was left home to rest and watched Hanekom do his job better.”


Statements like these make me wonder if Ben has ever watched a game of rugby in his life. Hanekom had a good game, Wiese is probably the premier 8 in world rugby and has been for a while.

W
Wit Kant 27 days ago

Ben just really does not want to see Wiese play the AB’s, Hanekom is a great player, but I think Wiese cemented his spot as nr1. Boks weren’t great, still won, we will be better off for it.

H
HS 28 days ago

In a ‘death by a thousand cuts’ strategy you use Jasper Wiese to soften the opponents up and Hanekom to finish it off.

A
Andrew 28 days ago

Will be a cold day in hell before Rassie prefers Hanekom to Wiese

J
J Marc 28 days ago

Why ?

J
Johan 28 days ago

The question is whether we can win without contestable kicks and the scrum. If the AB’s nullify those two areas we might struggle…

T
Two Cents 28 days ago

Interesting that failing to live up to hype and expectation seems to mean entirely different things depending which team it is.


When it's the Boks, oh everything's just gravy and even though it means something wasn't working well nothing to worry about. They're still definitely a sure thing for the series.


When it's anyone else, they're done, they're finished, they're no chance at all. Ridiculous double standard. That's why people don't like your fans. Too arrogant.


Defensively, the Boks were sound but when they had the ball, so wasteful. They just kept forcing things that weren't on and the execution and communication all round was poor.


Lots of guys really looking like they hadn't played rugby for a long time which, although expected because they haven't, in no way accords with the positive almost glowing evaluations.


Way too generous in the ratings. There's no excuses for guys with the amount of experience that these Boks do that it should be acceptable for them to underperform as they did.


If you're not going to accept it from other teams, then you can't excuse it away for your own team.


On the balance of the performances the Boks will be lucky to win a single test of the series and may even risk dropping another to Australia.


Of course, they won't be that poor by the end of the series and very likely will at worst be looking at 2-all.


But it was such a far cry from the high standards that we have all come to expect from Rassie teams that there's no way they get a pass, even though they won.

Q
Quincy79 28 days ago

And I’ll concede several points:


the Springboks were too wasteful,

the attack lacked fluency,

communication looked off,

and some experienced players were clearly short of match sharpness.


I also agree that winning should not automatically produce glowing ratings.


Where the argument loses me is in the scale of the conclusion.


You say they were far below the standards of a Rassie side, and I think that’s fair.


You then say they may be lucky to win a single Test and could even drop another to Australia.


That doesn’t follow from the evidence.


A poor performance can lower confidence without overturning the larger picture.


And that larger picture still matters because it is not based on one match. It is based on a sustained run of performances against multiple opponents, under different conditions, over a significant period

.

I also think you’re right that some Bok fans can be too quick to dismiss criticism, just as some All Black fans are too quick to dismiss South African strengths as one-dimensional or referee-assisted.


The rivalry is better when both sides acknowledge flaws.


So my position is not:


“Everything is gravy.”


It’s:


“The Springboks were well below their usual attacking standard, but the broader evidence still makes them favourites until New Zealand changes that evidence on the field.”


That is not arrogance.


That is weighting the last 80 minutes against the last 18 months.

W
Wayneo 28 days ago

Winning ugly is exactly what world-class teams do TC, complaining about ratings completely misses the point of Rassie's selection strategy.


Ratings mean nothing if they are note put out by Rassie Erasmus so I would ignore the ratings if I was you.


Rassie made 13 changes to blood depth, starting a fresh front five that had never packed down together.


Big names like Etzebeth, De Jager, and Sacha were playing their first minutes of 2026, so ball-in-hand handling accuracy was understandably rusty early on.


It wasn’t a poor performance, it was a tactical adaptation game.


The Boks put up 43 contestable kicks, but Pumas utilized the new retreating catcher escort rules perfectly to disarm the chase.


Even with our primary aerial weapon nullified, the Bok defense adjusted on the fly, forcing double-digit phases beyond the 80th minute to hold the Pumas behind the gain line.


Look at the technical adjustments - Rassie brought on Steenekamp, Porthen, and Wessels, completely shifting the scrum dominance to power Cameron Hanekom over from the base.


Despite an early 10-3 deficit and losing Kolisi to a hamstring injury, the team still ground out a 17-10 win away from home.


Building depth requires testing new combinations in high-pressure Test matches.


Winning a tight match when your set-piece is heavily rotated isn't luck or arrogance, it's structural depth and unmatched squad resilience.


Safas trust the process under Rassie, which is why we aren’t freaking out.


TC, to be straight up honnest here, if the Boks can secure a win while playing far below their ceiling, it should terrify the rest of the world for when everything clicks.

W
Wayneo 28 days ago

I am old enough to remember when the Pumas beat the All Blacks 29 – 23 in Buenos Aires in August last year…

T
Two Cents 28 days ago

I’m old enough to remember when the Brave Blossoms beat the Boks at the World Cup.

G
GG 28 days ago

Be interesting which of these Boks will be picked for first test vs ABs. Maybe Sacha, Thomas du Toit and possibly Eben. A few on the bench though.

G
GG 28 days ago

Poor game and aimless kicking. Other than game time this was really a futile excercise. The only excuse or reason I can think of is they had 8 guys coming back from injuries who needed time on the field and other than Siya injury this worked out. The ball followed Sacha a bit too much and he also got way too involved. His desire to put himself about worries me as he never avoids contact or defense. At least he came through ok but was absolutely knackered at the end.

H
Hammer Head 28 days ago

Both are good.


As I said some time ago, Hanekom will replace Kwagga’s role off the bench.


Wiese to start.

G
GrahamVF 28 days ago

Kwagga has a habit of scoring when he comes on and that’s not co-incidence. He offers extra pace and is expert at running onto good places with anticipation thanks to his sevens experience. I wouldn’t write him off just yet - especially i with a 6/2 split which will be standard going forward. It may well be either Hanekom or Wiese on a rotational or horses for courses basis.

B
Bazzallina 28 days ago

Sounds bout right to me HH

G
Gd 28 days ago

Thanks Ben

As a Saffer, I appreciate a well thought out and balanced article.

South Africa were poor on the night, which does also give some context to NZ’s sub-par performance on Friday.


Can’t think that many of these SA players will be lining up in the first test against NZ but expect that they would have received an earful from coach Rassie after the game and a number of them may line up in the second test.


Both NZ and SA will have learnt from this weekend.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GodOfFriedChicken 8 minutes ago
Dave Rennie's 12-word verdict on the Springbok scrum in Soweto

I don’t blame the play style - that’s been our game for a while, and they were still good around the park and scoring out of it. You take them away and we lose our advantage which is speed around the park. And while having more pushing from the loosies would certainly help, it’s still the tight five that’s gonna have to do the bulk of the improvements. A large part of that as well is how unsettled the combinations are compared to the Boks, who’ve built that cohesion between a range of players in their pack over a long period of time.

Selection alone won’t be a quick fix, especially looking at what happened to scrummaging when you go further down the depth chart in the club games. Stats show that front row is a position that a number of premier clubs in NZ are struggling to fill, affecting depth, and the ones good enough to go pro will keep getting rude awakenings in test rugby if the majority of their high level scrummaging at that point has either been against other Kiwis or against Australians especially, since scrummaging has never really been their forte. It becomes even worse when some teams manage to hoard test front rowers (e.g. the Crusaders under Razor having 1.5 All Blacks front rows at their disposal in every game). Leads to them thinking they could do more of the same at test level (much like how Razor seemed to think we could impose our set piece on the rest of the test nations just because he could do the same with the Crusaders against the rest of Super).



...

45 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close