With the biggest event on the global calendar due to rise across the women’s rugby horizon in only four months, England are determined not to make the same mistake again. In fact, they are determined not to make the same two mistakes again.
Wind the clock back to 12 November 2022, with England riding the wave of a 30-match unbeaten run before losing in the dying breath of the Rugby World Cup final to hosts New Zealand. If that was not enough of a heartbreaker, the England women have proceeded to win their next 25 games since – including three consecutive wins over their 2022 nemesis – and that has rubbed more salt in the wound.
But beating the Black Ferns when it really matters is only one half of the story. When England last hosted the World Cup in 2010, it was ill-prepared for the fast growth potential of the game. Only 13,000 spectators watched the final at Twickenham with England losing another nailbiter, predictably to the Black Ferns 13-10.

Thirteen years later, 58,498 fans were in attendance to watch England and France meet in a Six Nations Grand Slam decider at the old cabbage patch. Even that figure was eclipsed by the 66,000 who turned up on the opening day of the Women’s Sevens at the Paris Olympics.
That potential went unrealised at the time – much as it did after the England men’s World Cup triumph in 2003. In 2010, there were no changing sheds designed with women’s needs in mind. Now there are two professional leagues in England and New Zealand, and a promising third, the ‘Women’s Elite Rugby League’ launched in March in the lucrative US sports market. It has eight years to set a solid footprint in the sand ahead of the 2033 World Cup, to be hosted on the far side of the Atlantic.
Women’s rugby is well on the way to becoming a global professional sport. “Women’s rugby in the U.S. is a combat sport, and positions itself as ‘aggressively inclusive’ so we had to find an edge to each [franchise],” commented Flo Williams, director of women’s sport at sports marketing agency MATTA, which is responsible for the promotion of WER. As such, the marketing curve is marching in perfect step with the cultural times.
WER is bankrolled by private investment and has a full front-office staff on tap to promote the game. The 2025 Women’s World Cup will be free-to-air on the telly with the BBC, where the 2010 tournament sat behind a paywall on Sky Sports. The free-to-air Women’s Six Nations in 2024 was the most viewed on record, with 8.1m people tuning in for three minutes or more, a rise of one third compared to the year before. The eight venues chosen – London and Brighton in the Southeast; Bristol and Exeter in the West Country; Northampton in the Midlands; Manchester in the Northwest; Sunderland in the Northeast and York in Yorkshire – neatly cover off all the main demographics.
Nothing has been left to chance. Some 100,000 females are projected to be playing the game in England by 2027 under the aegis of the ‘Impact ‘25’ legacy programme. Funding began three years ago, with over US $3.8m being invested in 655 clubs nationwide, and 350 clubs having received grants to start under-12s activity by the end of 2024. Even beauty product manufacturers such as Clinique have become involved in the investment in women’s rugby, enhancing the game’s allure.
Only one month ago, World Rugby announced a massive 275,00 tickets had already been sold for the 2025 World Cup. The final itself is sold out and will set a new world record of 82,000 spectators for a women’s match.
If there is a cloud on that universally sunny horizon, it may be that England are just too dominant as a global force. The Red Roses have only lost one of their past 56 matches and that dominance is hardly likely to be diminished by a succession of games played on their home patch, in front of their own people.
Up until the very last match of the championship, the 2025 Six Nations had been a bit of a cruise. Their average margin of victory was 53-7 and they had to wait until the final round match against France to experience anything resembling persistent scoreboard pressure – even if it was of the tenacious, comeback variety. Of all the sides who have entered ‘mortal combat’ against them for six years or more, only Les Bleues and the Black Ferns have threatened to emerge from the contest alive and kicking.
How do you combat an opponent with a 98% win rate over six seasons, who are about to hold a global competition on their own turf? France gave us some of the answers. Under the watchful stewardship of ex-All Black John Mitchell, England have expanded their playing platform from the driven lineout-based outfit of his predecessor Simon Middleton. At the 2024 Six Nations, it was the Red Roses’ dual playmakers Holly Aitchison and Zoe Harrison who enjoyed the highest average pass distance [6.7m and 7.1m respectively], with Aitchison passing for the most metres [1012m].
With 20 minutes to go against France, Mitchell’s ‘new model England’ was reinforced by the BBC’s own in-game passing analysis.
Like their men in the Top 14, Les Bleues attacked mainly off nine, with Pauline Bourdon Sansus, who had the most try assists [five] in the 2024 edition of the tournament, to the fore. Then they offloaded when they had made the initial breach [top-ranked with 72 offloads in 2024].
In contrast, England played mostly off 10 or 12, and they used probably their best passing back in both directions [inside centre Tatyana Heard] to create width.
Typically, you would see a forward pod automatically set up to carry off nine after the ball has just reached the far side-line in that first clip, but the Red Roses are far more ambitious on Mitchell’s watch. They insert Heard at first receiver and make two more passes into midfield before the defence closes, and that is enough to create a mini-break.
The Gloucester-Hartpury inside centre looks for all the world like the natural successor to Emily Scarratt as England’s new midfield maestro, on the next occasion passing sweetly off the left hand to create England’s third score of the game for full-back Emma Sing.
The problems for England began on the other side of the ball, where France scored six tries. As ‘Mitch’ commented after the smoke had cleared, “I wasn’t happy with the defence. I thought they got through us too easy through the middle. We adjusted that at half-time, but the edge of the defence was not up to standard.”
Les Bleues began by attacking the Red Roses around the fringes of the ruck, between defenders one and three. When they could get arms beyond the tackle, they offloaded.
England’s forward tackling in that area was moderate and the presence of scrum-half Natasha Hunt sitting in ‘the boot’ behind the ruck hardly provided the insurance policy that might have been expected.
The wellspring of hope for other nations in four months’ time will be that when the Roses adjusted to plug the gaps on the inside at oranges, their wide defence proved just as porous when France put out feelers in the 15m-5m zones.
Two of those breaks/tries come on first phase, the first from right wing Joanna Grisez and the second from her partner on the left, Kelly Arbey. In both cases, initial defence on the edge is weak and it does not get any better in the second tier from the cover. In the final example, the final defender slips over and Grisez beats another three potential tacklers from over 50 metres out on her way to a spectacular try.
As the flying wing said afterwards: “We just stuck to what we had said: if we wanted to beat England, we had to play freely. Honestly, that big 20-minute lapse clearly cost us the match. But when we played without overthinking, we dominated — that was very clear. If it’s not today, it will be this summer. In rugby, you have to play, that’s what it’s [all] about.”
The women’s game is preparing for success in August, and whatever happens, it will extract every drop of juice from the World Cup to further its wider aims. Whether the Red Roses are there to hoist the trophy at the end is another matter. There are enough chinks in their armour to offer Les Bleues, not to mention the Black Ferns, scope for optimism. The Red Roses could be left feeling all black and blue once again.
Women’s rugby in South Africa has been sorely neglected but that is about to change. SARugby has announced the floating of a professional league and plans to contract around 150 players nationally. Currently only the Bulls Daisies are professional players.
Just as the SA Woman’s cricket team has come of age since a lot of time, expertise and money have been finally allocated to them, so it is at last believed that the SA women’s rugby team could start to make significant strides in the next few years. On a personal note, my daughter got a scholarship to Durban Girl’s College on the strength of her netball - but her first love was rugby. When I was coaching Kloof Senior Primary U11’s I used to let her join in with her class mates. I had taught her to tackle when she was tiny sitting on the edge of the bed with her standing on the bed and she would “tackle me down” though today she would definitely been carded for throat tackles 😁 Her class mates told me she was the “hardest” tackler in the class and she used to be a first choice for their lunch break games which to the dismay of some were full contact sessions. She went on to play representative net ball but if she had been born 15 years later there is no doubt she would have made her mark in rugby.
The Bulls Daisies? That sounds like a contradiction in terms G. Esp if they are anything like their men’s predecessors in the blue jersey.
Did anyone ever call Mof Myburgh a daisy?
Full copntac lunch break games! Only in SA😂
Nice post, Graham. Great story of your daughters sporting prowess. Indeed, pity she is not 15 yrs. younger !
Kloof, outside Durban ? I know the name from Zimbabwe, where my wife’s parents named their first farm Kloof….was outside Bukawayo, Nyamandhlovu
As mentioned in a couple of posts, don’t read too much into one game. England were largely in control of the match but some sloppy play let France back in and gave them hope when they should have had none. Momentum changed a bit and that is a powerful factor in most sports. France played their best game by far of the 6N and England played their worst. Mitchell will have learned a lot. Canada pushed England closer in WXV than in reality France did last Saturday. I think it will be an England v Canada final and a fairly tight affair. I wouldn’t rule Canada out.
Knockout tournaments will only amplify that uncertainty BC. One slip and you are gone. All of NZ, Canada and the Blues will have taken heart from what happens when England move ‘out of structure’ in that game. There is a patten there.
So I don’t full go along with the sloppy/won’t happen again theory.
I can't believe people actually watch this sh!te.
I sincerely hope my handle GrahamVF isn’t confused with this prick.
…or read some of the comments eh?….
Hi Nick. Thanks for this. The wide tackling wasn’t up to snuff at all. The offloading and straight carrying from the two big French locks and the 7, was damn impressive though. England showed heart though - kept scoring to stay ahead when under fire.
I was part of a large crew at the game with 15 girls from Barnes u14’s and another 30 adults. Beautiful weather, great atmosphere and a terrific match - what more could you ask for as a precursor for the last game of the season the next day where we played off in 3v4 Surrey final (lost, sadly)?
One thing Twickenham needs to do is add more permanent female toilet facilities. Not one adult women in the party failed to mention the massive time required for a break.
France look comfortable in their own skins playing that game DM. Just like their men have a found a way diff to the other in the 6N. It’s an important part of their developmen and they will believe they can take it further.
Thanks for the Twickers background, and glad you had such a wonderful day!
I’m surprised no-one is mentioning Canada. They are deservedly number 2 in the World Rankings and very nearly defeated England in WXV.
I’m hoping for an England win but will be very wary of Canada, France and NZ.
I have tickets for the Semi-Finals and Final and I can’t wait for what should be a wonderful tournament.
Tbh I don’t know much about them, it can be hard to find decent footage of the women’s game. But yes, top 4 material.
Interesting article, but an important factual point: the 2010 Final was held in Twickenham, but not at Twickenham. It was held across the road at The Stoop, Quins’ home ground, and 13,253 represented both 90% of the Stoop’s capacity and a world record for a women’s game at the time.
That tournament was held when World Rugby was smarting from 7s not being included in the 2012 Olympics because of the lack of investment in the women’s game, and just beginning to realise the potential of women’s rugby.
It wasn’t that England was ill-prepared for the potential of the women’s game, it was that WR and many of the unions had systematically ignored, downplayed and even suppressed the women’s game for decades. The RFU was, in the grand scheme of things, one of the more progressive unions in promoting the women’s game and has been consistently leading the way ever since.
The 2010 tournament was a huge step forward for its time - though RWC 2025 could and should mark the moment when women’s rugby really starts to accelerate.
Yes it came at a time when the potential of Women’s sport was only just being realized. Soccer exploded with the England side winning the Euros, and now rugby is looking to follow suit. A ome WC can do that for you and esp after England failed to exploit the interest in the men’s game after their 2003 win it is vital. They looke very well prepared for it.
A most interesting and informative article Nick. I must admit to not having watched any woman’s rugby lately, but will be watching the upcoming RWC with interest.
We have friends living near us whose daughter is in the Australian squad…… Georgie Friedrichs. The family came here post the Zimbabwe farm invasions, so similar to the Pocock family. I will also be following the Irish team…..fair number of girls there with Gaelic games backgrounds.
I had not realised just how dominant the English team have been. But then such dominance can be a big weight to carry at an RWC. A team like France or the Black Ferns peaking at the right time, and with the luck a winning team always needs, plus decisions and the bounce of the ball going their way, can rightly aspire to toppling a “Goliath”. I’m sure it will be a great tournament in England, made all the more interesting by the sellout crowds for the big games.
Gaelic backgrounds aye, very interesting, and not just in how they can perform or transition skills. I wonder if say women might be the trigger to start men looking at the pro game etc then.
Thanks for the background Miz. Good to see that cross-pollination occurring from GA in Ireland.
England will be wary, cos teams like NZ and France have nothing to lose and everything to gain. The peoblem of big wins is that you can forget how to handle pressure. Lesson of Leinster I suppose!
One would think the next Womens RWC is the Roses to lose, they are a better balanced side than 4 years ago. That’s not to say they won’t; NZ will certainly be a contender, and lest we forget it was France who should have put NZ out of the final of the last cup, but for a sitter of a penalty missed.
Yes Mitch has tries to cultivate a more balanced approach, though they have lost some of that without a genuine 7 to replace the likes of Marlie Packer and Maggie Alphonsi.
I think sometimes the media can get carried away with 1 game. This game went exact same way as 2 years ago-england go into big lead,france come back strong and england hanging on at the end. It ended up having no wider context than that 1 game.England put in a very uncharacteristic defensive display at the weekend-I doubt england will be that poor in defence again. That said I do not think England are guaranteed to win world cup-the pressure and intensity of semi finals/finals is different as we often see in the mens world cups. New zealand are a brilliant world cup side capable of peaking at the right time,and canada/france very capable too.
It was very different to the beatings gave all the other four nations Chris. It’s easy to say they won’t repeat that D performance but any coach will be worried when it breaks down in two diff areas within the same game. It gives both France and NZ hope in a few months time.