Northern | US

WPRFU deny Newlands has been sold for £5.7m


Comments
Comment

Western Province Rugby Football Union (WPRFU) have dispelled rumours circulating on social media that Newlands has been sold – report Rugby365.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Stormers captain Corné Krige tweeted on Friday that there has been speculated that the stadium had been sold for ZAR100-million (£5.7m).

However, WPRFU President, Thelo Wakefield, made it clear that any suggestion that Newlands has been sold is false.

“WPRFU has not sold Newlands for the rumoured amount, or for that matter any of the Union’s properties.

“The previously stated position with respect to properties owned by the Union remains unchanged,” Wakefield said.

Rugby365com reported that Newlands has been put up as ‘security’ for outstanding debts owe to investment holding company Remgro.

In July, Remgro confirmed to rugby365 that the Western Province Rugby Union has registered a mortgage bond – in favour of the Stellenbosch-based company – as security for an outstanding loan worth more than ZAR40-million.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was believed properties owned by WPRU that could raise a bond of more than ZAR40-million include the Brookside complex in Claremont or the rugby complex at Montreal Road, Oranjezicht, in the high-demand residential City Bowl area.

However, insiders have revealed that Newlands was put up as security – which did not sit well with WPRU officials.

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close