Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global

World Cup bidding process to be overhauled following 2023 debacle

By RugbyPass
(Photo by Getty Images)

In the wake of the controversy which followed France’s shock victory over Ireland and South Africa to host the 2023 Rugby World Cup, the bidding process is now expected to be overhauled.


France won the right to host the World Cup after a secret ballot in November and today, speaking to the Telegraph, World Rugby’s chief executive, Brett Gosper, said a review would now take place after admitting the current process had left the governing body “open to what is a perceived contradiction that doesn’t look tidy”.

He suggested, that it was likely the policy of the board recommending a host in future bidding processes would be scrapped, while the policy of secret ballots and the two-week gap between the announcement of the independent evaluation and the vote taken by World Rugby’s council would also be under review.


Gosper also revealed that World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont had “not been happy” to inherit the policy of the board recommending a nomination when he was elected in 2016 and had already looked at changing it.

“There are parts of the process that we will probably change next,” said Gosper. “I guess the hardest part of the review and the most contentious part of the review was actually providing a recommendation. To be fair on Bill and Gus [Agustin Pichot], when they arrived on the scene, they found that and they weren’t happy with that.

“But because we had embarked on a system, there were certain elements that certain countries were really keen that we were not to change. In the end we felt that was probably the right route to take. To change course halfway through the process was going to be uncomfortable for all sorts of reasons.”


Gosper also acknowledged the objections which were raised over the secret ballot, “I know we have been criticised a few times. If the fors and against were equal, from a perception point of view an open vote sounds transparent and maybe we should consider that.”


Join free



Trending on RugbyPass


Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

Shaylen 5 hours ago
Ireland and South Africa share the same player development dilemma

These guys will be utility players Nick it cannot be helped because coaches cannot help themselves. Rassie looks at players like these and sees the ability to cover multiple positions without losing much. It allows the 6-2 or 7-1. He wont change his coaching style or strategy for one player. At provincial level players like these are indispensable. If there is an injury to your starting 12 but your back up 12 is a bit iffy then a coach is going to go with the back up 10 who is gold and who can play a good 12. Damian Willemse for the Springboks is an obvious case, for the Stormers its the same. Dobson plays him at 12 or 15, with Gelant in the team he plays 12 but if Gelant goes down he doesnt go for his back up 15, he just puts Willemse there. With Frawley its the same at international and provincial level. He just slots in wherever. Frans Steyn made a career out of it. He was much maligned though as a youngster as he never fully developed into any role. He then went to Japan and France to decide for himself what kind of player he was, put on muscle and retained his big boot, ran over players and booted the ball long and came back into the Springboks after about 3 years away and was then certain about how he wanted to play the game no matter what position. Coaches cannot help themselves because they only want what is best for their teams and that means putting your most talented players on even if it means you cause them some discomfort. Sometimes players need to decide how they want to play the game and then adapt that to every position and let the coach decide how they want to use them.

37 Go to comments
Jon 11 hours ago
Ireland and South Africa share the same player development dilemma

I think the main problem here is the structure of both countries make up. They are going to have very similar.. obstacles(not problems). It will just be part of the evolution of their rugby and they’ll need to find a way to make this versatility more advantageous than specialization. I think South Africa are well on the way to that end already, but Ireland are more likely to have a hierarchical approach and move players around the provinces. Ioane is going to be more than good enough to lock up one of those available positions for more than a few years I believe though. Morgan would definitely be a more long term outlook. Sacha to me has the natural footwork of a second five. Not everything is about winning, if a team has 3 players that want to play 10s just give them all a good go even if its to the detriment of everyone, this is also about dreams of the players, not just the fans. This is exactly how it would be in an amateur club setting. Ultimately some players just aren’t suited to any one position. The example was of a guy that had size and speed, enough pace to burn, power to drive, and speed to kick and pass long, but just not much else when it came to actual rugby (that matched it). New Zealand has it’s own example with Jordie Barrett and probably shows what Reece Hodge could have been if the game in Australia had any administration. Despite the bigger abundance of talent in NZ, Jordie was provided with consistent time as a fullback, before being ushered in as a second five. Possibly this was due to his blood, and another might not have been as fortunate, but it is what it was, a complete contrast to how Hodge was used in Australia, were he could have had any position he wanted. When it comes down to it though, much like these young fellas, it will be about what they want, and I think you’ll find they’ll be like Hodge and just want to be as valuable to the team as they can and play wherever. It’s not like 63 International Cap is a hard thing to live with as a result of that decision!

37 Go to comments
FEATURE Ireland and South Africa share the same player development dilemma Ireland and South Africa share the same player development dilemma