What we learnt from the women's game in 2021
It’s been a whirlwind year for women’s rugby, with some brilliant steps forward made in attendances, investment, and television coverage (mainly in England), but we can’t forget 2021 has also seen moments of inequality littered throughout, with players, supporters and management still asking for more.
If we have learnt anything from this year, it’s been that England are unquestionably the dominant force in the world game. The squad contains World Rugby Player of the Year Zoe Aldcroft and nominee Poppy Cleall. Not to mention the team are currently on an 18 match winning streak and scored an embarrassingly high 99 points against the reigning world champions New Zealand during the recent Autumn Internationals.
World Rugby Coach of the Year Simon Middleton has been in charge of the side for almost seven years now and this consistency has paid off as referenced by Wales international Elinor Snowsill in her recent interview.
England are a side that look primed and prepped to win back the World Cup next year. They were crowned 2021 Six Nations champions and players know what their roles are in any given situation. Even debutants seem extremely comfortable in the Red Roses environment, also every position has a formidable back up option and with the sport’s pinnacle event on the horizon, they’re showing no signs of slowing down.
We also learnt that France isn’t far behind England (they also put a whopping 67 points on the Black Ferns this Autumn) and had two players nominated for World Player of the Year in Caroline Boujard and Laure Sansus.
.@zoealdcroft_ has had quite the year! ?
? World Rugby Player of the Year
? Women's Six Nations 2021 Title
? Red Roses unbeaten in 18 Tests
? Captained England for the first time#12DaysOfChristmas pic.twitter.com/TNPavKLTxl— England Rugby (@EnglandRugby) December 17, 2021
After missing the mark so frequently against England in the 2021 Six Nations and last year’s Autumns, they’ll be like a dog with a bone at next year’s tournament and it’d be naïve to write them off to lift the World Cup trophy, or at least make the final.
And what do France and England have in common?
This is by no means new news, but if we needed any more evidence, this year proved that teams who receive significant investment from their unions, who take their women’s team seriously, and play regular Test matches, will thrive. Plus both countries have successful domestic leagues below them drip feeding ready-made international standard athletes into their national setups, it’s a recipe for success.
What also speaks volumes is how a team’s success on the field can influence factors off the field. For example, the BBC showing all four of England’s Autumn International matches on terrestrial TV, opening the sport up to a new, more casual audience and recording one million viewers for the England v Canada match alone on BBC Two- talk about return on investment.
Add to that how the success of the Premier 15s and the standard of rugby also saw the BBC announce they will broadcast the league live for the first time, with a match shown each weekend on iPlayer and the BBC Sport website and app- build it and they will come, as they say.
For all their bad press earlier in the year and a dismal Six Nations campaign, the November Tests showed us that Wales are picking up, with promising wins over Japan and South Africa and the introduction of contracts appearing in the new year. Wales also finally seem to have nailed down a coach in Ioan Cunningham and fingers crossed he stays in place to offer the players some badly needed consistency and leadership.
Unfortunately, over this Irish sea the scene has not looked so promising. Despite recording recent wins over the USA and Japan, Ireland failed to qualify for the World Cup in September and the year has ended with 62 current and former players writing to their government expressing their loss of trust and faith in the IRFU and pointing out the union’s failing in governing the national women’s programme over a sustained period of time. Hopefully the result of this sees more transparency and long overdue change at the helm of Irish women’s rugby.
Finally, as mirrored by the men’s Autumn results, it seems the northern hemisphere teams are pushing ahead. For the men it’s mid-World Cup cycle but for the women this could prove significant as we are less than ten months away from the postponed tournament in October 2022.
As demonstrated by the Black Ferns returning home winless from their Northern tour, England and France are strides ahead, with the Springbok Women still playing catch up with the remainder of the European nations. The USA also saw a winless Autumn campaign with losses to Canada, Ireland and England.
It could be that regular Test match rugby in the form of the 2020 and 2021 Six Nations has kept the competing northern hemisphere nations afloat during the challenging times of the pandemic, whilst other teams without an annual international competition have struggled.
This has highlighted the fact that New Zealand’s Rugby Union need to buck up their ideas and organise more matches for their Black Ferns. Covid and geography aside, not playing a Test match is over two years is simply unacceptable, especially when the All Blacks managed to squeeze in 18 games in the same period, yes 18!
There will be plenty for the team to mull over on the trip back home, ahead of a huge 2022.#FRAvNZL
— Black Ferns (@BlackFerns) November 20, 2021
It doesn’t take a genius to realise that if you don’t challenge your world champions players with top quality opposition for a long period of time, other nations will overtake you. Hopefully, the introduction of Super Rugby Aupiki and the four teams competing in the competition this coming March, will provide the players some much needed Test match standard duals as regularly seen in the top half of the Premier 15s table.
With some teams looking to fine tune their winning formulas and others just starting out on new journeys or embarking on new eras, it’ll be exciting to see what the future brings on the pitch as we prepare for a jam-packed and promising 2022.
Comments on RugbyPass
This is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
2 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
4 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to comments