Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'We've been camped up in the hotel, not sure if the game would be played'

By PA
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Dean Richards was left to bemoan a lack of accuracy after his Newcastle side squandered a late lead to draw 24-24 with Worcester in the Gallagher Premiership.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the swirling snow at Kingston Park, the Falcons looked to have sealed the game through Kyle Cooper’s 72nd-minute try, only to be pegged back immediately when Worcester’s Billy Searle scored.

In a match delayed by a day due to Storm Arwen the hosts botched a number of opportunities in the Warriors half and collapsed defensively late on, much to Richards’ frustration.

Video Spacer

Guess the celebrity Rose | Karen Carney | England Rugby

Video Spacer

Guess the celebrity Rose | Karen Carney | England Rugby

Richards said: “We probably should have taken five points. Full credit to Worcester, when they had chances, they took them and we didn’t take ours.

“It was always going to be a game of two halves with the wind and the weather being as it was. Having the wind behind us in the first half, you’ve got to capitalise and we didn’t.

“We went into the break two points up at half-time when we probably should have gone in 15 to 20 points up which we didn’t do.

“We will look at our defensive frailties and why we conceded the easy tries that we did, but, at the same time, we scored four tries and probably should have scored another four which is the frustrating thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The first half is about where you play your rugby and the second is about taking your opportunities and we probably didn’t do either particularly well.”

Richards’ reaction stood in stark contrast to Worcester head coach Jonathan Thomas, who was elated by his side’s effort following an adverse 24 hours.

While Cooper’s late score could have sealed the contest, Worcester fought back through Searle’s try, which was masterfully converted by Fin Smith to secure them three points on the road, leaving Thomas delighted.

Thomas said: “I think the biggest thing I spoke to the players about before the game was our mindset, that warrior mindset, because there’s been so many things thrown at us in the last three days.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve been camped up in the hotel, not sure if the game is going to be played and obviously the conditions, we weren’t sure if it was going to be wind, snow or frost.

“The biggest thing we spoke about before the game was let’s have a no excuses mentality – we knew it was going to be tough but we didn’t want to use that as an excuse.

“I’m really proud of the character of the players and there were a lot of challenges we had during the game.

“Sometimes it’s not about the technical or the tactical, it is just about revealing your character in tough games like that and that is what we did.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 18 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'The Irish go a little too far' - Gibson-Park impresses French, to a point Gibson-Park impresses French, to a point
Search