Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Western Force open to bringing back James O'Connor

James O'Connor during his tenure with the Force.

Days after former Wallaby James O’Connor revealed he wanted to represent Australia again, one of his former clubs have expressed interest in his signature.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eleven years after O’Connor made his Super Rugby debut as a 17-year-old with the Western Force, the club have come calling once more.

Former teammate and Western Force Head of Elite Performance Matt Hodgson said O’Connor was being looked at as the side gear up for another run in their World Series Rugby competition.

“That’s the type of player we’re looking for,” Hodgson said in an interview with ESPN.

“Obviously knowing James quite well, he’d potentially be one we’re looking at. I think he fits the criteria we’re looking at, especially leading into a World Cup year.

“Like James mentioned, [if] he is interested in coming back for the World Cup, then this is a good avenue and something we would potentially look at.”

The 28-year-old, who hasn’t played for the Wallabies since 2013, currently plays for Gallagher Premiership club Sale Sharks but revealed earlier in the week that he had “a deep desire to play for the Wallabies again.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I have learnt from my mistakes and I am now ready,” O’Connor posted on Instagram.

“Ready to bleed green and gold. Ready to bleed for my brothers. Ready to bleed for the people.

“I will be back playing in October and I will have my eye firmly on the World Cup. I will not let myself or anyone down again.”

The Wallabies are currently approaching the tail end of their Rugby Championship campaign and will play against South Africa next weekend.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 8 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING New Zealand U20 score in dying minutes to draw with South Africa U20 New Zealand U20 and South Africa U20 draw
Search