Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'There's no way': Siya Kolisi believes Etzebeth innocent of deliberate intent

Siya Kolisi of South Africa celebrates his team victory for his 100th cap after the Autumn Nations Series 2025 match between France and South Africa at Stade de France on November 08, 2025 in Paris, France. (Photo by Lionel Hahn/Getty Images)

Springbok captain Siya Kolisi has defended teammate and good friend Eben Etzebeth and claimed that there was no intent behind the scuffle that saw the lock red carded in Cardiff.

ADVERTISEMENT

Etzebeth was judged to have eye-gouged opponent Alex Mann with a couple of minutes remaining with the Springboks comfortably up 73-0. After review, the officials issued a permanent red card.

Speaking after the match, Kolisi told media he believed that Etzebeth was innocent of any deliberate intent in the scuffle. The pair hold a close relationship having been long-time teammates at the Stormers and within the Springboks.

VIDEO

Kolisi revealed that Etzebeth had apologised to Mann after the game to put the incident to rest.

“I’m sure he didn’t mean to do that on purpose. There’s no way,” Kolisi told media.

“If you go for an eye-gouge, you know what happens after that [a red card and ban].

“Eben’s said sorry to the guy already. But I don’t want that to be the highlight of the day. It’s been a good day.”

Regardless of Kolisi’s defence, Etzebeth could be looking at an extended stint on the sidelines.

After an eye-gouge against the British & Irish Lions in 2009, Springbok flanker Schalk Burger was handed an eight-week ban.

More recently in the URC, winger Makazole Mapimpi copped a three-match ban in the URC after an incident against Cardiff which went undetected during the game in January this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

A judiciary found him guilty of eye-gouging and handed out the suspension after also taking to account a similar previous incident in 2023 against Bordeaux-Bègles scrumhalf Maxime Lucu in 2023.

Etzebeth became the third Springbok lock during this Autumn period to receive a red card, following Lood de Jager and Franco Mostert.


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

26 Comments
u
unknown 48 days ago

Trail by media

S
SC 48 days ago

David Attoub, without a such clear evidence and a less dangerous act was banned for 70 weeks. I guess between 80 and 100 weeks should be fair.

P
PMcD 48 days ago

Ben Smith - I like your style, two articles showing outrage of Eben Etzebeth before you release the article on why the AB’s have gone backwards in 2025. For the life of me I can’t understand why some fans believe you have a bias towards a certain team.

🤣🤣🤣

E
Eric Elwood 48 days ago

Kolisi will always show loyalty to Etzebeth. Their relationship since youngsters is central to SAs rugby story.


If Mann slapped Etzebeth to start it then he should get the appropriate citing.

I wasn’t happy yesterday with what Etzebeth did. He will get a huge ban. rightly so, but this was red mist. Apart from that he is a man of integrity who learns from mistakes and grows. I hope he gets back playing and dilutes this so he leaves a legacy on his own terms.


RP are regurgitating this story for clicks which is annoying.

H
Hammer Head 48 days ago

The chief click merchant is on it

u
unknown 48 days ago

Neil Nortje

u
unknown 48 days ago

Neil

u
unknown 49 days ago

Whether or not the eye gouging was intentional, it was still wrong. But what I don’t understand is why no one is talking about the build up to the incident. Something must of happened to trigger it. Both parties are to blame. Siya‘s reputation for me has gone up as he’s showing loyalty. Anyone would back the friend/teammate, imagine dropping them straight in it, where would one stand amongst the rest of the team.

R
RC 49 days ago

Well this has brought kolisi’s stature down considerably. Eye gouging is so specific, it doesn't happen without intent.


Shame on them both.

M
MM 48 days ago

My only regret is the Boks never put a 100 nil score against those utterly useless Welsh who should NEVER AGAIN be a fixture against the Springboks. We don't need it or want it.

F
Flankly 49 days ago

Red card all day, with suspension to follow.


It seems that Mann’s palm punch to Etzebeth’s chin is what instigated it. Obviously the punch is much less serious than an eye gouge, but also unacceptable.


However, if Josh Murphy got no sanction whatever for two clear and obvious strikes on JH Wessels then I suspect Mann will also be cleared.

H
E
E M 49 days ago

Shame on both. It’s obviously deliberate. They just can’t argue with that without being accomplice. I remember a french took 70 weeks for less that what we saw. Let’s see how much World Rugby are gonna shame themselves. The joke continues.

S
SC 48 days ago

David Attoub was banned 70 weeks for less. I guess between 80 and 100 weeks should be fair.

H
Hammer Head 48 days ago

Define deliberate for me?


I doubt very much Etzebeth made the conscious decision to go for his eyes and or to damage Mann’s eye.


He makes contact and it’s a red card all day. No argument. But to call it deliberate is far fetched.

J
JJ 48 days ago

David Ayoub, but it was his second ban for eye gouging.

B
Bazzallina 49 days ago

Yea I would prob agree Siya but jeesh put ya hands on someone face like that thumb def went in the eye

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 10 minutes ago
Jeff Wilson: 'They didn't play with a great deal of confidence'

Agree Robertson failed badly. But you don’t give him enough credit for the reformation he was undertaking. Perhaps it was a Crusader plan - but why is that a negative - he won 7 Super Championships with it - it would be surprising if he did not look to build a team around a plan that had that level of success. But it was in any event directed to meeting a hard fact - ABs had fallen well behind the power and intensity of SA and France, and latterly England. For too long the ABs had become over reliant on a smash and grab all of game counter attack. By stark contrast Robertson was focused on building structured power game where he could rely on set piece dominance and synchronised attacking structures. At one level it produced a remarkable statistic - 87 % of tries scored from set piece and within the red zone. Of course the negative flip side is the almost total absence of counter attack. But perhaps more importantly Razor was visibly reshaping the forwards - he could now assemble a starting and impact pack to rival the gargantuan packs of SA and France for the full 80 minutes involving among other things a three lock second row strategy with Vaa’i and Holland playing 6 when fit that when deployed never went backwards including against the Boks and 6-2 French impact packs. His greatest failure in my view is that he was too conservative and did not fully implement this structured power game and go 6-2 especially against the English who had already mastered what NB has called “periodising” - the art of maximising intensity at key times. The loss against them was highly predictable because of it. But it is simply wrong to say that Razor did not innovate - he did but as you say lacked the confidence or ability to get his team to fully implement. Razor also clearly had the insight that if he did not build the Black Crusaders the ABs were are serious risk of free fall. A stark statistic in this regard is that the tier one team with the bigger combined start in impact packs measured by collective weight and height won all games against other tier one teams last year including the ABs v SA at Eden Park, the Boks in Wellington, Paris and Dublin and the English in London. Finally, Razor this year achieved the best win % improvement of all tier one teams last except England (and they did not play the Boks) and the ABs was the only tier one team to beat the Boks. So yeah he failed but give him some credit.

PS I am not a Crusader fan and looking forward to Joseph taking over.



...

6 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT