Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

SuperSport's race row deepens as four more presenters make accusations

By Online Editors
Ashwin Willemse

The Ashwin Willemse saga is a festering boil in desperate need of being lanced – report Rugby 365.

ADVERTISEMENT

The latest developments – weekend newspaper reports that four more presenters accused SuperSport of racism – are symptomatic of the deeper putrefaction of the troubles at the pay-TV station.

According to reports, SuperSport presenters Owen Nkumane, Xola Ntshinga, Kaunda Ntunja and Gcobani Bobo have accused the broadcaster of racism, victimisation, pay disparity and intimidation.

This comes at a time when former Springbok Ashwin Willemse and his lawyer, Nqobizitha Mlilo, ramped up their battle with SuperSport over the former player’s decision to walk off set during a live broadcast back on May 19.

An initial inquiry into Willemse’s walkout stated that there was ‘no racism’ on the part of fellow presenters Nick Mallet and Naas Botha – ‘naked racism, subtle racism or otherwise’.

Willemse, who refused to participate in the review by Advocate Vincent Maleka because it was ‘not the right forum to air his view’, decided to go to the Equality Court – where he is planning to go head-to-head with SuperSport.

The additional charges brought by the four presenters – Nkumane, Ntshinga, Ntunja and Bobo – appears to add weight to Willemse’s argument.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clinton van der Berg, Communications Manager at SuperSport, confirmed to rugby365 that they have received a letter from MVMT Attorneys, written on behalf of the four presenters.

“SuperSport has taken note of the letter,” Van der Berg said.

“The matter is being thoroughly investigated. The investigation is almost complete.

“SuperSport will communicate directly with the individuals concerned,” he concluded.

Willemse met with SuperSport management late last week, in the hope of reaching a compromise. However, they appear no closer to a ‘settlement’ and the presenter’s lawyer, Mlilo, indicated that there is no ‘common ground’.

Mlilo is demanding the release of a second report, allegedly prepared for the company. In an interview with public broadcaster eNCA, he said the meeting did not have a feeling of reconciliation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The meeting was almost meaningless,” Mlilo said in the interview.

The latest developments – including the letter from the four additional presenters, which arrived after Willemse indicated he was going to court – suggests there are many issues previously not brought into the public domain.

The letter further states that the presenters believe that certain roles are reserved for non-white presenters and that white contractors are paid more than black contractors.

They also suggest that these black contractors are expected to do more work.

They further stated that black presenters are subjected to victimisation, public humiliation, abusive language, intimidation and other inappropriate behaviour from management.

SuperSport’s media statements that there is ‘no racism’ and Willemse’s claims that the whole incident is ‘rooted in racism’ will take centre stage when the entire saga plays itself out in court.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
Roger 2 hours ago
Why the Wallabies won't be following the Springboks' rush defence under Schmidt

You forget this is Rassie Erasmus who is still holding the Springbok keys. Even with Felix Jones orchestrating a really tight RWC SF last year. It still wasn't enough to get England past their particular Springbok Monkey in world cups. The reason is FJ was going off of what they did in 2019 not necessarily adapting to current Springboks. So yes, Australia can get passed England because let's be honest, England have a one track strategy, Springboks do not. Even with rush defense I wouldn't be surprised if Rassie continually tweaks it. Also bear in mind Rassie is happy to sacrifice a few mid year and inter World Cup matches to pin point how opposition plays and how to again tweak strategies to get his Springboks in peak performance for the next World Cup. As much as most teams like to win games in front of them and try to win everything, Rassie always makes sure to learn and train for the greatest showdown International Rugby has to offer. Tbh, most people remember World Cup wins and ignore intermediate losses as a result but will remember also WC losses, Ireland, even if they won games in the interim. So even if games are won against the Springboks, it's likely Rassie is just getting a feel for how opposition is moving and adapt accordingly…in time. For Rassie, a loss is never a loss because he uses it as a chance to learn and improve. Sometimes during a game, again like the England match in last year's Semi Final.

7 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Mo'unga back-up shines in his absence while Barrett magic secures win Mo'unga back-up shines in his absence while Barrett magic secures win
Search