Northern | US

Springboks concede famous bench tactic finally 'backfired' against All Blacks

Rassie Erasmus, the South Africa head coach, looks on prior to the 2026 Nations Championship match between South Africa and Wales at Kings Park Stadium on July 18, 2026 in Durban, South Africa. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)
Comments
24 Comments

Springboks head coach Rassie Erasmus has conceded that his famous 6/2 bench tactic “backfired” on his team against the All Blacks at Ellis Park, and it was an avoidable mistake.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa, famous for their physical forward pack, opted to double down on that strength for game one of the Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry Test series, stacking their bench with six forwards and just two backs as opposed to the traditional five forwards and three backs, which provides more even cover in the event of injury.

While hybrid midfielder-cum-loose forward Andre Esterhuizen provided a safety net with his versatility, Erasmus revealed that the original plan for the 193 cm, 113 kg Sharks bruiser was to deploy him as a flanker in the match.

VIDEO

A 21-3 second-half scoreline was the difference in the match after a too-tight-to-call first half, highlighting the teams’ respective reserve units. Not helping Erasmus’ plans for the match was a ninth-minute injury-forced substitution, which disrupted his desired impact from the bench later in the contest.

While the coach wouldn’t lay any blame at the feet of his bench for their impact, despite them accounting for two yellow cards as the game slipped away from the hosts in the second half, he did recognise the final quarter of the match as an issue that needed addressing.

Following the match, Erasmus denied the suggestion that the loss was a “catastrophe”, saying the Boks have been down before and have always found a way to fight back. That perspective was maintained at Monday’s team announcement, though it included additional context this time around.

“Obviously, it’s concerning. When I say it’s not a catastrophe, it’s awful. It’s shit. It’s not nice to be in this position. I would rather play bad and win than play good and lose. I thought for quite a number of minutes, we played well, but we lost. That’s frustrating,” the coach summarised.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t want to make excuses because what happened was on me and on us as a team. But I think for the first time in a long time, the 6/2 (bench) experiment backfired on us. I’ll say it as it is. But I think, odds-wise, if you take how many times we’ve done it, I think this is the first one.

“When Kurt-Lee (Arendse) got injured, Jesse (Kriel) went to the wing, Damian (Williemse) went to outside centre; we would’ve liked to play Andre as an impact flanker, he had to go to 12, then the whole backline was rejigged with that one injury to Kurt-Lee. That was bad planning by myself.

“Probably a better thing would have been to put Gaza (Willemse) on the wing, put Sacha (Feinberg-Mngomezulu) at fullback and put Manie (Libbok) at 10. Then the 12/13 stays intact. We also had Grant (Williams) that could have gone to wing and Cobus (Reinach) could have come straight on. I think I made the incorrect sub there and that disjointed the whole attack flow, and obviously some of the defensive stuff.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

24 Comments
O
Over the sideline 45 days ago

I dont think its an experiment any more is it? Many sides do it and SA has done it for years.

i can’t see SA going back to 5-3

T
Tom H 45 days ago

It wasn’t a 6/2 split. They had a 9, 10 and 12 who covers backrow

J
JW 45 days ago

Yeah fair cop by Rassie, not so much a bench failure just the wrong call being made.


I like Gaza going to 12 and still pushing Kriel to wing most, though probably tactically Williams to wing would be best. Gaza to wing seems just wrong and a failure of the 6/2 format (if there wasn’t a better wing option, and again, I think there was in Williams) and his rational if he likes that idea.


Assume the author of the article didn’t understand what Rassie was saying and which Damian he was referring to?

p
pm 45 days ago

Credit to Rassie for his honesty & humility .. expect the Boks to rise to the challenge in the mother city ..

U
Utiku Old Boy 45 days ago

Part of Rassie’s credibility and success is his honesty and owning his mistakes. It sets a great example for his whole squad. The adjustments will be real and the contest is heading for another great match because the ABs will also adjust.

J
Jon 45 days ago

Agree with you Utiku, I have been super impressed with Rassie’s response to this loss. He has clearly demonstrated his authenticity. As a neutral, I watched the game in Aus from Sky NZ and then watched the last 30 minutes on replay from SA coverage to see what the SA commentators made of the referee decisions. Thinking I was going to hear much whinging I was pleasantly surprised with the honest and open commentary. Looking forward to this weekend…awesome game for a neutral to get excited about.

B
B 45 days ago

Great insights but the strange thing is that Esterhuizen scored off the wing shortly after getting on. As much as they may have missed him on the flank later on, how different might that half time score have been without him?


I think SFM is a full back. For all the bright, young spark chat, the lad is 26 now and still hasn’t controlled a test game. His attacking game has more space playing at #15 and won’t be stifled by a lack of gain line dominance or a lack of go forward.


They have astonishing potential with Wiese. The guy runs through walls but the cleaners are never quick enough to support him. I don’t understand why they don’t work on their ruck speed, even if their traditionally slow style has been successful in the past. You wouldn’t even need a kick-chase game if you got him breaking tackles with a mob of mates running directly behind him.

J
JW 45 days ago

He was marked by a winger (Ardie failed to see the threat and respond to Moorby calling for more players) yes but I wouldn’t say it was scored “off” the wing.


Considering the ABs didn’t use their version of Andre until the 75 minute yes it made little difference impact wise on the game (balance wise, they could still have punished the ABs for poor bench usage by getting it right themselves I suppose). The big one for me is the ball never went past SFM, and when it did on that try, it never went past Andre at 12! Having the normal pair or Willemse shift in would have allowed the Boks much better attack options.

G
GH 45 days ago

Sacha is a 15! Agree!!!

p
proooooovince 45 days ago

(Sascha is 24 not 26)


Springboks missed a couple of chances, it could all have been very different had Marx not dropped the ball over the line just before half time.


All Blacks played well, took their chances, and rode the momentum at the end. A bit like Wellington in reverse. But just like that game did not suddenly mean the All Blacks were bad, this does not mean the Boks are a bad side.

u
unknown 45 days ago

Thanks for article, I think the main thing for me is that he (Coach Rassie) got his substitutions wrong because he had cover in the 23. From my perspective, watching the game live, I was a bit confused when Andre came on for Kurt Lee, it didn't even occur to me that Jesse was playing wing because I didn't think he would be playing there.

H
HS 45 days ago

Damian de Allende went to outside center, not Willemse.

p
proooooovince 45 days ago

But in any case, the 2 other plans Rassie described are much better

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close