Northern | US

'Not been good enough' - Sharks to axe John Plumtree

Hollywoodbets Sharks head coach John Plumtree before the United Rugby Championship match between Leinster and Hollywoodbets Sharks at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Tyler Miller/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
Comments
2 Comments

The Sharks have confirmed that head coach John Plumtree will step down at the end of the 2025/26 season as part of wide-ranging structural changes at the Durban franchise.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the club’s ownership and management said a “comprehensive review” of rugby operations had been undertaken following a disappointing start to the campaign.

The review, which involved stakeholders across all levels of the organisation, concluded that the team’s problems were “multi-faceted” and required systemic change rather than “simple fixes.”

The Sharks said in a statement: “John Plumtree will step down as Head Coach by mutual agreement at the end of the 2025/26 season. Plumtree retains the complete backing and support of ownership, management and players. To continue building on the significant contributions he has already made, he will move to a mentoring and advisory role.”

To assist in the interim, the Sharks will bring in a technical coach consultant “as a matter of urgency” to focus on on-field performance and the team’s game model. “My priority has always been what’s best for the Sharks and that remains my focus,” said Plumtree.

Director of Rugby Neil Powell will assume broader operational responsibilities, including oversight of the academy and junior systems, player recruitment, logistics, and medical and rehabilitation programmes.

Chief Executive Shaun Bryans said the organisation’s entire rugby programme would remain under review for the rest of the season, with external experts to be brought in to help drive improvements.

“Our performances this season have not been good enough, and we owe it to our fans and stakeholders to acknowledge and take full responsibility — no excuses,” Bryans said. “That accountability sits across the entire organisation — from management and players, to myself as CEO.”

“As an ownership group and leadership team, we remain ambitious about the future of The Sharks and, over the coming months, no stone will be left unturned as we look to build a high-performance environment capable of delivering the success that our players are capable of and that our fans and partners deserve.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
G
GrahamVF 218 days ago

“Director of Rugby Neil Powell will assume broader operational responsibilities, including oversight of the academy and junior systems, player recruitment, logistics, and medical and rehabilitation programmes.” If that was not part of his responsibilities as director of rugby no wonder the Sharks are in such a mess. Perhaps he’[ll have to relocate from Cape Town to Durban to actually do something.

H
Hammer Head 219 days ago

About time.


Now who to replace him with? At least the sharks have some money behind them. To get someone good in.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 1 hour ago
France has conquered and reconquered Europe. Can it reach its Mount Everest?

It’s mind boggling that the best are not playing the best in July! Though the commercial reality bites here. On the B/C/D I think the issue is one of communicating ideas. You point out that in reality the majority of the players were third or fourth choice or perhaps worse. And the way you explained it as someone who clearly knows the French comp that makes sense. So I accept that it was perhaps a third or fourth choice team overall. I should be clear though I think that the quality of the team exceeded the sum of its parts. And I think a D grade is way too low. Their performance was too good to get such a grade. And I think that reflects that they are very good players who had a good chance to build combinations. Would the first choice players have played better - very likely. But that does not diminish the performance of the boys that played.

Put another way, I understand that the French team that played the Boks had a good number of first choice players in stark contrast to the teams that played in NZ. But they did not perform like an “A” team - clearly they had only got together just before that game. They started well but the lack of match readiness showed in the second half. In contrast the Boks had both their first choice team that was a battle hardened unit - and they played their A game, as they did against the ABs first choice team in Wellington. In contrast the first choice ABs beat the then first choice Boks in Auckland - it was the best performance all year by the ABs - it was an A grade performance (the Bok dominance in the forwards notwithstanding).



...

612 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close