Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Scottish rugby player receives three year ban

By Ian Cameron
PA

A Scottish Rugby Union player has been banned from all sport for a period of three years following a first Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) after he tested positive for banned substances.

ADVERTISEMENT

Douglas Steele, a flyhalf at Marr RFC, failed a urine sample test following a visit to a training session at the club.

A Scottish Rugby Union statement reads: “On 27 January 2022, UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) collected an Out-of-Competition urine Sample from Mr Steele at a Marr Rugby Football Club training session. Analysis of Mr Steele’s Sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) for a metabolite of dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT) and metabolites of oxandrolone.”

DHCMT is also known as Turinabol, while oxandrolone is commonly sold as Anavar and both are anabolic agents.

Related

“DHCMT and oxandrolone are both anabolic agents, listed under S1.1 of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2022 Prohibited List. Both of these non-Specified Prohibited Substances are banned at all times.

“On 12 May 2022, UKAD notified Mr Steele of the AAFs and issued him with a Provisional Suspension from sport.”

In August of this year UKAD charged Steele for the presence and use of prohibited substances. He admitted to using the substances less than 20 days after receiving the charge letter,and accepted the four year ban, which was reduced to three years.

ADVERTISEMENT

“UKAD issued Mr Steele with a three-year ban, which is deemed to have commenced on 12 May 2022 and will expire at midnight on 11 May 2025.

Speaking on the case, UKAD Director of Operations, Pat Myhill said: “Players who use anabolic agents to improve their performance, or who do not follow the principles of strict liability in clean sport, are letting the side down. Anabolic agents such as these are prohibited in sport at all times, and can have serious health risks for the athletes taking them.”

Scottish Rugby’s Chief Medical Officer Dr James Robson MBE said: “We operate a zero-tolerance policy for any prohibited substances, which have no place in our sport. In many cases they have a detrimental effect on the health of the individual and as such we welcome today’s ban which can act as a deterrent to others who may be tempted to take them.

“We run a comprehensive education programme and will not hesitate to implement our intelligence-led approach to target those who we suspect may be using prohibited substances at any level of the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 15 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search