Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Sale Sharks and Springboks set for tug-of-war over Faf de Klerk?- reports

By Ian Cameron
Sale Sharks' Faf de Klerk

Sale Sharks could become the latest Premiership side to establish an understanding over the use of contracted players in the Rugby Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Rugby Championship obviously falls under the current World Rugby international window, however rest weekends do not. This effectively means that players contracted to play in Europe could potentially be called back to play for the European club sides during the tournament.

This has typically not been an issue as all four of the Rugby Championship side have had in place both formal and informal selection policies that stipulate that players playing overseas are ineligible for selection unless they meet strict criteria.

However, Australia have introduced Giteau’s Law that allows players over 60 caps to represent the Wallabies even while playing their club rugby abroad, while South Africa have all but ditched their policy a year out from the Rugby World Cup.

This has inevitably brought players representing their country in the Rugby Championship and the contractual requirement to play club rugby thousands of miles away- albeit on rest weekends – into conflict.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Last week Leicester Tigers stated that they would be expecting both Wallaby hooker Tatafu Polota-Nau and flyhalf Matt Toomua to fly back to the UK during the Rugby Championship.

Yesterday, RugbyPass exclusively revealed that Springbok Willie Le Roux and Wasps had come to an arrangement on the matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Young, who is currently overseeing Wasps training week in Portugal, told RugbyPass’s Chris Jones:

“You could ask the question; If Willie had been playing in a Wasps team producing rubbish rugby would he have been recalled? There is no doubt that your style of play helped push his case for a Test recall and we are always delighted when one of our players gets international recognition. However, the fact is that when we signed Willie we didn’t expect him to be playing for South Africa, but he goes with our best wishes.

“Willie is likely to miss our first three Premiership matches and we have worked this out through discussions with everyone involved. It is great that he is back in Test rugby and with a change of coach, Willie wanted to be part of it again. Willie will be back for three Premiership games leading into the European matches and he may go back for one more game with South Africa so the maximum games he will miss for Wasps will be four.”

Now it seems that Sale Sharks may come to a similar arrangement with Springbok scrumhalf Faf de Klerk.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Afrikaans news outlet Netwerk 24, Sale Sharks have not ruled out coming to an agreement with the player.

Sale Sharks told Netwerk24 that there was “not an agreement as such” currently in place with the scrumhalf, but they apparently went on to say that “I think all involved parties would have to compromise to make sure everyone is happy.”

What exactly this means it obviously not yet clear, but Sharks will be eager to have their star scrumhalf out on the paddock. Likewise, the Springboks will equally want to field de Klerk, who was arguably the player of their Junes series against England.

Wisely, Springbok headcoach Rassie Erasmus has chosen four scrumhalves in his squad – Embrose Papier, Ivan van Zyl, and Ross Cronje (aswell as de Klerk himself).

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search