Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RWC 1991 documentary 'The Founding Four' launches crowd funding campaign

The Founding Four were inducted into the World Rugby Hall of Fame in November 2022.

A documentary ‘The Founding Four’ currently in production, is due to air ahead of the 2025 Rugby World Cup, to tell the incredible untold story of the first ever World Cup tournament, organised against the odds by four extraordinary women with no funding and no experience.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alice Cooper, Deborah Griffin, Susan Dorrington, and Mary Forsyth were the four pioneers who overcame countless barriers to stage the first ever tournament in 1991, without sponsors and without the backing of the Rugby Football Union or the International Rugby Board (now World Rugby).

The team behind the documentary consisting of one of the founding four, Alice Cooper and rugby broadcaster and producer Nick Heath, has today launched a fundraising campaign to help complete the film — unlocking incredible archive footage and capturing international voices who were there.

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025

Cooper said: “This story just has to be told. With the tenth Women’s Rugby World Cup just weeks away, how many people know how the very first one was delivered? It’s a timely reminder of the first generation of women’s rugby players who started the ball rolling. We urge anyone who loves the camaraderie and spirit of rugby to consider donating and help us to get this project over the line.”

‘The Founding Four’ were inducted into the World Rugby Hall of Fame, in November 2022.

Who are the founding four?

Deborah Griffin – As co-founder of the Rugby Football Union for Women, Deborah selected a quartet of Richmond RFC teammates to join her on a mission to stage a tournament that would see 12 international teams competing over nine days, all with her five-month-old daughter by her side.

Sue Dorrington – Alongside focusing on playing – at hooker for England when they reached the final – Sue’s experience of fundraising for her club led her to take on the sponsorship role for this inaugural world event.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alice D Cooper – Already a contributor to ‘Rugby World & Post’, Alice took on press and media duties. From giving interviews to curious and doubting journalists, to publishing the tournament programme, the demands were relentless.

Mary Forsyth – With accounting acumen, Mary had already tidied up the accounts of the men’s side of the club, so was the natural fit to take on the finance role, despite a scarcity of funds. Her daughter Kathryn was born a week before the tournament started.

12 teams took part in the inaugural 1991 tournament in hosts Wales, Canada, England, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, USA and the USSR with the teams split into four pools of three.

England, France, New Zealand and USA progressed to the semi-finals, with England taking on the USA in the final which saw the Americans claim a 19-6 win.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2025 Rugby World Cup will be the tenth edition of the tournament taking place from 22nd August- 27th September in England. Buy tickets here.

New tickets for Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 are now available, with prices starting at £10 for adults and £5 for children. Buy now!

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
CN 7 days ago

I think there was a stage production of this story a few years ago. I hope this does get the funding, particularly with Nick Heath behind it, very few men do as much as him in advocating women’s rugby domestically and internationally. Thank you Nick

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week
Search