Laws of the game go out the window in opening days of Rugby World Cup
It’s been arguably two of the best opening days of a World Cup in the history of the competition, with a victory for the hosts as well as three intensely-fought matches.
So, what have we learned so far?
Pieter-Steph du Toit is the front runner for the Player of the Year
It’s been a monstrous year to date for Springboks tackling machine Pieter-Steph du Toit. Du Toit started out his professional career as a lock and has all the aerial skills needed to compete with the best second rowers in the world, but his mobility around the field is also exceptional.
Du Toit topped the tackle charts against the All Blacks on Saturday night but was also regularly on hand to truck up the ball when called upon. He also scored a crucial try for the Springboks. The blindside flanker is arguably the best in the world at his trade right now – especially when it comes to the core roles – and it will take a monumental effort from someone else to grapple World Rugby’s Player of the Year award away from the loose forward.
Rieko Ioane isn’t going to feature in the knockout stages of the tournament
Perhaps not a hot take anymore, given his fall from grace, but going into the World Cup there was still a chance that All Blacks wing Rieko Ioane could nab back his spot from George Bridge.
Continued below…
That looks almost impossible now, with Bridge performing well against the Springboks on Saturday night and making the most of his chances.
After the Crusaders outside back was handed the 11 jersey against the Wallabies for the last Bledisloe Cup match of the year, the left wing berth became Bridge’s to lose. Two good performances against top sides now means that Ioane’s only opportunities to present his case will come against minnows like Namibia and Canada.
Even if Ioane comes alive against the tier-2 and 3 sides, that won’t be enough to usurp Bridge, who will likely turn out against Italy.
Japan are going to struggle against teams that can hold onto the ball
The Brave Blossoms have adopted an absolutely frenetic style of play in recent times.
Cuts left, right and centre will have plenty of teams flummoxed – including the Pacific Island sides that Japan outplayed during the Pacific Nations Cup – but it’s not going to work against Scotland and Wales, who have far tighter defences camped out around the breakdowns.
Their high-speed play ironically also didn’t pay dividends against Russia on Friday night – but you get the sense that was because Russia didn’t fan out too far from the ruck due to their lack of fitness. Had Japan spread the ball to the wings they liked would have prospered.
High tackle laws? What high tackle laws?
In the first two matches of the competition, Japan v Russia and Australia v Fiji, one player should have been sent off in each game for high tackles.
Russian scrumhalf Vasily Dorofeev copped a shoulder to the chin from Brave Blossom locks James Moore part-way through their opening fixture of the competition. Under the current laws, a shoulder to the head without any mitigating factors is an instant red card.
Looks like the officials missed a potential red card. Imagine what that would have meant in this match. #JAPvRUS pic.twitter.com/cIw7Bass1G
— Jacques Burger (@Nabasboer) September 20, 2019
In Saturday’s game between Fiji and Australia, a similar situation occurred early in the match, with Wallabies wing Reece Hodge turning his shoulder to brace against rampaging Fijian flanker Peceli Yato. Yato had to leave the field for an HIA and never returned – yet Hodge received no sanction.
High Tackle Sanction Framework
Shoulder or high? Shoulder, because the right arm is behind plane of body on contact
1. Head contact? Y
2. Danger? Automatically high for shoulder -> head
Entry point = red
3. Mitigation? No
Final = redI also don't know why it wasn't referred… pic.twitter.com/bwTPSsA7bF
— Ross Tucker (@Scienceofsport) September 21, 2019
Japan and Australia were the victors in those matches, who could know how the games would have changed if the winners were down to 14 men?
There’s a 36-hour window after a game in which a player can be cited, which means that James Moore escaped sanction. Who knows whether Hodge will be punished? Even if the players were punished after the match, that will be of no consolation to the losing sides.
Offside line? What offside line?
The offside line is rarely policed anymore.
There were multiple instances in all four games played so far where defences crept up to nail ball carriers as soon as they had hands on the pill.
When Picamoles intercepted Argentina…not offside says Angus Gardner ?
Huge moment #FRAvARG #RWC2019 pic.twitter.com/XHebI6pP5Y
— Tim Cocker (@cocker) September 21, 2019
The lack of running opportunities for attacking teams have fallen in recent teams. Supposedly this is because of the line speed that teams on defence are adopting; the rush defence is hugely common now.
In reality, however, the rush defence is only work so efficiently because teams are regularly half a metre offside and can shut down attacking sides with ease.
This is becoming especially common on the goal line. If one team is camped out trying to prevent the ball carrier from crashing over for a try then you can be sure that almost the entire defensive line will be offside.
If we have viewers new to the game of Rugby for this World Cup – please don’t concern yourself about tying to grasp laws around the breakdown. One less thing to worry about. They don’t exist. Offside line soon to follow suite to help you even more. You’re welcome.
— Ben Ryan (@benjaminryan) September 21, 2019
The defending team have to all be behind the back foot of the hindmost player at the ruck. That’s certainly not been the case at the World Cup so far.
Extending rucks is against the spirit of the game
One of the most frustrating things to watch in rugby right now is when players ‘bind’ onto the ruck so as to give the halfback more time and space to get away a box kick. We’re now seeing rucks extending three or four metres from one team’s side to the other’s.
It happens ruck after ruck, game after game, and it’s completely against the spirit of the breakdown.
According to the World Rugby laws, “the purpose of a ruck is to allow players to compete for the ball which is on the ground.”
Rucks are now being used as shields to ensure that box kicks can’t be charged down, which completely goes against their purpose. If players are joining onto the ruck with no intent to help secure the ball then referees should be sending them away.
Fiji will push Wales all the way
The Flying Fijians sure are a sight to behold.
Perhaps they lacked some of the technical skills to compete with the best of the best, but their athleticism, power and speed will make mincemeat of the Uruguayans when they face off later this week.
They’ll also do very well against Wales – especially if the Red Dragons are off their game.
There are a few areas of improvement for Fiji, namely in the scrums, but they will feast on any ball that Wales gift them with.
When Wales and Fiji face off on October 9th, Wales will have already played Australia. If they win that match then there’s a very good chance they’ll make the quarterfinals, but if they don’t manage to get the victory against the Wallabies then the game with Fiji could have major repercussions.
France and Argentina live for the World Cup – but probably won’t scare England
It may be a huge cliché, but there’s no better way to describe France and Argentina’s fixture than a game of two halves.
France rushed out to a handy 20-3 advantage at halftime, then Argentina clawed their way back to take the lead 21-20.
Had Argentina won, it would’ve been the biggest comeback in World Cup history.
Regardless of the result, there was plenty of endeavor from both sides. The two nations have, at times, been some of the best sides to watch in world rugby but they’ve both underperformed in recent times.
We already knew that Argentina and France save their best rugby for the World Cup and they could both trouble some of the other top teams in the competition – but only if they can pull it together for a full 80 minutes.
Argentina were pretty poor in the first half and France should never have let the Pumas back into the game.
The English team will have watched the game knowing that if they play to their usual standard, they will strangle the life out of their pool opposition. Even if England aren’t at their best, their ability to maintain their performances for a good portion of every game will mean they’ll come out as victors.
Comments on RugbyPass
It was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
5 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
3 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to commentsGreat read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.
2 Go to commentsThe current AB coaching team is basically the Crusaders so it smacks of wanting their familiar leaders around. This is not a good look for the future of the ABs or the younger players in Super working their way up the player ladder. Razor is touted as innovative, forward looking but his early moves look like insecurity and insular, provincial thinking. He is the AB's coach not the Golden Oldies.
10 Go to comments