Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby Australia secure eight-figure loan after major sponsor walks

Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh speaks to media. Photo by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images

Cash-strapped Rugby Australia has secured access to an $80 million line of credit over the next five years in its bid to pump more money into developing the floundering code.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just a day after losing Harvey Norman as a major sponsor in what presents a multi-million dollar blow, RA announced the $80 million loan agreement with Pacific Equity Partners.

RA had entertained the idea of private equity, but in the end decided to take on a huge loan knowing that the 2025 British and Irish Lions tour and the 2027 (men’s) and 2029 (women’s) home World Cups would help pay off the debt.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The news comes just days after Hamish McLennan quit as RA chairman after six member unions demanded his resignation.

Pressure on McLennan reached fever pitch following the recent World Cup, in which the Wallabies failed to make it out of the group stage for the first time.

McLennan’s role in appointing the since-departed Eddie Jones as coach played a key role in his downfall.

Former Wallaby Daniel Herbert has been appointed as McLennan’s replacement.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA say the $80 million loan will go towards critical areas of the game’s development, with high-performance integration, women’s rugby and community and pathways being areas of focus.

Chief executive Phil Waugh believes pursuing a debt capital path was the right decision for rugby in Australia and believes the injection of cash will help set the game up for the future.

“Given the visibility we have on revenues from the British and Irish Lions and World Cups, it became clear that debt capital was going to be the best solution for Rugby,” Waugh said in a statement.

“This does not compromise RA’s options down the road, which could include private equity investment.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This approach ensures that we retain 100 per cent of the commercial revenues from the game, that all capital raised will go into the game, and that RA controls its own direction during this next period of growth and development.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 17 minutes ago
Robertson's departure could herald the biggest shake-up in New Zealand rugby history

I think much of the criticism around Razor is overblown. Since the Hansen era ended they have not won at anywhere near 85% in fact they havent even hit 80% and Razor was at 74%. So that is 6 years and while Razor did not improve the win rate it was not declining either. Razor had to also live up to the giant standards set for him by the media and the board who treated him like he was some sort of messiah. Too much negative press and a very conservative game plan was not a good look. He took some chances on selection and several players got chances and he has built some depth but not the 4 man depth in each position he was looking for. Its clear he lost the players so his position became untenable. I think some blame also has to go the way of the players here. Razor has set his stall out on several of them. Savea, the Barretts, Taylor, Roigard etc. These lads rarely if ever missed a game (provided they were fit). None of them came out to bat for him. Even his captain who he could have easily replaced because of his less than stellar form has not said a word. It shows the disconnect that existed between coach and players. Razor quite simply wasnt bold enough, did not take enough risks, he had creative differences with coaches, had his differences with the players and did not convince anyone he could push NZ rugby forward and back to sustained success. If anyone thinks a new coaching group is going to have an easy time doing it then they are deluded. With these players and with the NZ media and a clear shift in mindset amongst the board when it comes to coaches and player power I reckon the new coach is going to need all the luck he can get.

158 Go to comments
G
GodOfFriedChicken 19 minutes ago
Robertson's departure could herald the biggest shake-up in New Zealand rugby history

After the semis loss against England in 2019, I remember seeing people say that it was the result of that expansive ABs game no longer working even though it felt more like tactical brilliance from England paying off with their back row decisions, and the team choking at the weight of its own lofty expectations (as many ABs fans before 2011/2015 should be used to by now). Four years of Foster didn’t really help shake that either because while he tried to play a similar game, I don’t think he quite had the same attention to detail as Shag, Henry or Smith before him (if you’ve watched his Chiefs teams of the 2000s, you’ll see a wildly inconsistent yet exciting team that was gutsy but often dug themselves holes they had to climb out of - sounds familiar?).

With Razor though, the Crusaders did indeed win with a conservative game plans but also did so because they historically had a dominant forward pack both around the park and in set pieces led by the likes of Codie Taylor, Joe Moody, Owen Franks, Wyatt Crockett, Tamaiti Williams, Fletcher Newell, Sam Whitelock, Scott Barrett, Luke Romano, Blackadder when healthy and even Pablo Matera for a year. They could get away with it since the opposition forward packs were usually going backwards and with a lineup like that, it’s hard not to see why. In saying that though, putting my opposing fan cap on, a few writers have pointed out that those same Crusaders were also regularly penalized teams and seemed to imply that perhaps they got away with more at the breakdown than the All Blacks have been able to under his watch (something which I have definitely raged about watching their games)… Clearly though he thought the All Black pack was as far ahead of their competition as the Crusaders was over theirs.



...

158 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT