Northern | US

Jones backtracks on TV Smith/Farrell quip and has pop at Woodward


(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Eddie Jones has backtracked on his live TV comment that Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell is a strategy now seemingly set in stone for his England team. The teething 10/12 combination of the respective Harlequins and Saracens out-halves had its best outing yet on Saturday when seven tries – including two from Smith – and 52 points were scored against an outclassed Japan in the second match of their four-game Autumn Nations Series.

ADVERTISEMENT

That performance has put England back on track following last Sunday’s 29-30 slip-up versus Argentina, rejuvenating confidence that next weekend’s glamour Twickenham clash against the All Blacks is not a mission impossible for a home team that has struggled with inconsistent displays.

Jones implied during an interview on Amazon Prime that the Smith/Farrell combination was now here to stay. However, when the remark was said back to him at his media centre briefing about an hour after full-time, he retracted what he had suggested and added that if better information was required, journalists should instead ask ex-England boss Clive Woodward, one of Jones’ fiercest critics in recent times.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The subject of Smith and Farrell in tandem at the heart of English creativity behind a dominant pack was raised when a journalist said: “I think you said on telly you have already decided that Marcus and Owen are going to play together again. Have you set that in motion for the autumn now?”

Jones laughed when he heard this and he quickly put his big-sounding TV comment into context. “Well, that was with Dylan (Hartley) and Matt Giteau, it was like drinking at the bar, two old players.

Related

“But look, we think Marcus and Owen can be really good together but like any strategy, you have just got to keep having results and there is no reason why they shouldn’t continue being that, but we don’t get a team sheet and put those two names in ink that you can’t rub out.

“So yes, yes, we really like it but there is always changes that you need to make and we need to be flexible and we need to be adaptable and we will be. So this obsession with saying these two need to be ten and twelve is not the way we really think.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You (media) guys can think like that. I am sure Clive Woodward has got his thoughts on it, so maybe you can ask him. He can maybe give you some better information than I can.”

Having chuckled at himself for taking his latest swipe at Woodward, Jones went on to agree that the England attack did look far more potent than six days earlier when greatly shackled by the Pumas. “Our running and kicking game gave us opportunities to move the ball. They are a handy team, Japan – it was just seven points to the All Blacks (when they played in Tokyo two weeks ago).

“So we were able to get on the front foot through our running and kicking and then we were able to move the ball in the space but we probably missed 20 points. Conservatively we missed 20 points out there.”

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 26 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close