Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

John Mitchell asks Bulls board for $10 million war chest

John Mitchell

Blue Bulls head coach John Mitchell has reportedly requested NZD$10,000,000 (R90,000,000) from the Bulls board of directors in order to compete in the recruitment market for high-end talent, according to Rapport newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mitchell is concerned with the lack of depth in the Bulls squad, and the damage that is being done by playing youngsters too early in Super Rugby.

“We need to stop exposing youngsters to this competition too quickly and relying on youngsters who just can’t handle this competition, [while also] relying on a handful of Test players and expect them to last the full season,’ he said earlier this season.

“We have got a very good process and very good systems.

“We are going to have to recruit. It is as simple as that. We are going to have to change our mindset from quantity to quality and create two teams of Super Rugby quality to be able to manage workloads and injuries.

Video Spacer

The Bulls are reportedly targeting Springbok number eight Duane Vermeulen, retired hooker Schalk Brits, Frans Malherbe, Jean-Luc du Preez and Wandisile Simelane to bolster the quality of the squad. They recently missed out on the signature of Lions flanker Cyle Brink, who was reportedly close to joining the side.

Mitchell, who doubles as the executive of rugby, wants complete control of the high-performance programme and buy-in from the Board of Directors on his strategy. He refused a contract extension earlier this year to extend past the 2019 season and could use that as leverage until his demands are met. He is also after a full-time defence coach for next year’s Super Rugby season.

Members of the board are reportedly not happy with the request after this year’s performance. The Bulls finished the Super Rugby season in 12th position overall, with six wins and 10 losses coming in last in the South African conference.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment' Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment'
Search