'I just think our boys deserve better': Rennie clarifies why he's airing ref grievances
The Wallabies have lost a thriller at Cardiff’s Principality Stadium, with a Rhys Priestland penalty goal after the siren seeing Wales win 29-28 on Sunday morning [AEDT].
After losses to Scotland and England, the one-point loss has seen the Wallabies lose all three of their Tests in the United Kingdom this year, after beginning their Spring Tour on such a positive note.
The Wallabies have shown this year that they’re a team capable of challenging the best teams of the world, having beaten reigning World Cup winners South Africa twice. Those two wins were the beginning of a five match unbeaten run, with the last victory coming in late October against Japan in Oita.
While the Wallabies managed to record what may have seemed like an unlikely victory after going down to 13-men at one point, the performances and decisions from referees has once again come under fire.
On the field in a post-match interview, Wallabies coach Dave Rennie described the officiating in the Test as “horrendous”, before adding that “it played a big part in the result.” He specifically referenced yellow card to fullback Kurtley Beale, as well as a controversial try to Nick Tompkins.
Dave Rennie is bulling. #WALvAUS https://t.co/BaHi0t81xO
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) November 20, 2021
While uncharacteristic for Rennie to speak out publicly against referees, he continued to explain his frustrations in the press conference after the one-point loss.
“I make a real point not to criticise referees and we hand reports in and seek a bit of clarity around things,” Rennie said. “But we did that after the Scotland game, got a lot of apologies during the week in a game that was a two-point ball game and the same TMO who made a massive decision in that game as well.
“I just think our boys deserve better than that and that’s the reason why I spoke up after the game.
“It’s not going to help us getting apologies during the week, the game’s gone.”
Rennie went into detail with three key moments in the Test, that being the red card, yellow card, and the Tompkins try.
Wallabies backrower Rob Valetini was red carded just 15 minutes into the contest after a high tackle on Welsh lock Adam Beard, with the two appearing to clash heads in the process.
While Rennie said that he doesn’t have a problem with that decision, the same couldn’t be said for the yellow to Kurtley Beale which happened shortly after. The fullback was sent to the sin bin for a deliberate knock on.
He also drew parallels between that decision and the controversial try to Tompkins which you can also see below.
“I don’t have an issue with the red card because that’s the way it’s being refereed nowadays. Rob’s responsibility is to drop his height in the tackle and he didn’t and had a head clash so you’ve got to take that on the chin.
“I wasn’t happy with Kurtley’s yellow card. He’s making an effort to wrap two arms, it clips his hand on the way through, they find a yellow card for that?
“And yet Tompkins slaps the ball down in open play, somehow they say that didn’t go forward when he’s facing forward, and they get seven points out of it instead of getting a yellow card and us getting a penalty.
Have you ever seen a try like it?!
Nick Tompkins crosses for Wales’ 2nd try of the game
UK viewers can watch @WelshRugbyUnion v @wallabies live on @primevideosport ?#AutumnNationsSeries #WALvAUS pic.twitter.com/jEOWsiEFOw
— Autumn Nations Series (@autumnnations) November 20, 2021
“There were lots of decisions today, I’m not going to go into. But I felt that it had a massive bearing on the game.
“Our boys played with a lot of courage, a lot of heart tonight, and we almost did enough to win that.
“Incredibly disappointed with the officiating. Obviously we’ll follow up with a report.”
Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus was recently banned by World Rugby for comments he made about referees during this year’s British and Irish Lions series.
When asked about whether coaches and players worry about punishments for speaking out, Rennie respondent by saying “no doubt”, before continuing to share this thoughts.
“How do I support our team by biting my lip again and us getting apologies during the week. It doesn’t change the result.
“The boys emptied out the tank for each other and we deserved a better result than that. So I felt it was important that I spoke my mind.
“I’ve been a professional coach for over 20 years. I’ve never gone into media and had a crack at a referee or the referee group, but I felt I had to tonight.”
While the result may seen as controversial, the Wallabies still did well to stay in the fight against the Six Nations champions despite playing at least one man down for a majority of the Test.
“We’re incredibly proud of the effort. That was massive. We said we were going to empty out the tank for each other and when you’re one short and two short, you’ve got to do that.
“Heaps of character and we got put under the blowtorch, and I thought the boys responded really well.
“Really proud of the guys but as I said, I feel they deserve better.”
Comments on RugbyPass
It was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
5 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
3 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to commentsGreat read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.
2 Go to commentsThe current AB coaching team is basically the Crusaders so it smacks of wanting their familiar leaders around. This is not a good look for the future of the ABs or the younger players in Super working their way up the player ladder. Razor is touted as innovative, forward looking but his early moves look like insecurity and insular, provincial thinking. He is the AB's coach not the Golden Oldies.
10 Go to comments