'I believe': New Los Pumas coach Michael Cheika says Argentina can win World Cup
Newly-appointed Los Pumas boss Michael Cheika believes Argentina are capable of becoming the world’s best side at next year’s World Cup in France.
That’s the verdict he delivered in his first press conference as Argentine head coach since succeeding his former colleague Mario Ledesma.
Cheika has assumed the role of Los Pumas boss less than 18 months out from the 2023 World Cup at a time when Argentine rugby is at one of its lowest points in decades.
Despite a first-ever win over the All Blacks and two drawn matches against the Wallabies in Australia two years ago, Los Pumas endured a horror campaign last year, winning just three of their 12 tests between July and November.
As such, Ledesma called it quits and was replaced by Cheika, who worked as an advisor to Ledesma over the last two years after having served as his head coach during their time at the helm of the Wallabies.
Cheika brings with him plenty of experience to the Argentine role, but he has plenty of work to do to turn the world’s eighth-ranked team back into World Cup contenders by next September.
World Rugby’s 2015 Coach of the Year has no shortage of confidence in making that happen, though, as he told Argentine media that he will enter that tournament with the aim of winning the Webb Ellis Cup in Paris.
“We don’t go into any match, any competition, any tournament, without targeting winning,” Cheika said.
“Why else do you play if you aren’t going to target winning? What, you want to go and play to come sixth or to come fourth? All of that is just to make you feel good. Maybe you make a quarter-final to feel good.
“Where are we today? We’re certainly not in No 1 position in the rankings, but what I want to do is work smart, get players engaged in improving their level, make them believe that they can go further to achieve those goals and play your best every weekend, and see what happens, because I believe.
“It doesn’t matter what I believe, it matters what the boys believe, but I believe.”
Cheika, who guided the Wallabies to the 2015 World Cup final before overseeing a dire four-year period that ended in a World Cup quarter-final exit at the hands of England in 2019, will begin his quest with Los Pumas in two months’ time.
For the first time in three years, Los Pumas will play a home test in Argentina when they host Scotland across three tests during World Rugby’s July international window.
They will then host the Wallabies in what will be a blockbuster pair of home games to open their Rugby Championship campaign, before embarking on a two-test tour of New Zealand and finishing with home-and-away fixtures against the Springboks.
After a European tour where Argentina will face England, Wales and Scotland in successive tests, Cheika’s focus will then narrow in on France 2023.
Given the mountainous task of trying to win a World Cup amid an international climate where more than half a dozen of the world’s best teams could beat each other on their day, few – if any – will expect Los Pumas to win next year’s tournament.
Most would say it would be difficult for Argentina to even eclipse their best-ever finishes of semi-final exits, which they achieved in 2007 and 2015.
In fact, Los Pumas may have a fight on their hands to just get out of their group, as they are placed in Pool D alongside perennial heavyweights England, the ever-threatening Japan and a Samoan outfit that could be overhauled by World Rugby’s new eligibility laws.
Even if they do make it into the quarter-finals, a knockout match against any one of Australia, Wales or Fiji beckons, while a semi-final could pit them against the All Blacks, Springboks, France, Ireland, Scotland or even a new-look, potentially all-star Tongan team.
Considering where Los Pumas currently stand in the global scheme of things, the prospect of World Cup glory in France is unlikely at best, but Cheika remains firmly optimistic about Argentina’s chances.
“I just try my best, use my experience, and try to have a good process in making good decisions and then help players get better and the support team get better, and then trust them to go and play good rugby,” he said.
“That’s the foundation of a good team is when we trust each other.
“I’m the type of person who is going to give you trust straight away and if we keep it, we go further. I don’t know if that makes me the best candidate, but they’ve trusted me to do this job and I’m going to do it to the best of my ability.”
Comments on RugbyPass
Bulls by 5. Plus another 50.
3 Go to commentsJohan Goosen avatar. Cute. Surely someone at RP knows how to do a google image search?
3 Go to commentsCan’t these games play a little earlier? Asking for a friend.
3 Go to commentsIt’s impressive that we can see huge stadiums with attendance in the 40 000 to 50 000 region. It shows how popular this competition is becoming. What is even more impressive is the massive growth in broadcast viewership. The URC is one of the two best leagues in the World, the other being the Top14.
7 Go to commentsChristie is not Sottish, like the majority of the Scotland team.
2 Go to commentsHold the phone, decline over-rated. Is it a one game, dead cat bounce or the real thing? Has the Penney dropped? Stay tuned.
45 Go to commentsTotally deserved win for the Crusaders Far smarter than the Chiefs who seem to be avoiding the basics when it matters Hotham showed them what was missing and Hannah seems a real find - a tad light but that can be fixed over time
8 Go to commentsGreat insight into the performance culture with Sarries and I predict Christie will be a fixture in the Scotland team now for some time to come. However, he is slightly missing his own point around Scotland “being soft” when he cites physicality examples in defence of that slight. The issue is much closer to the example he referenced around feeling off before a game but being told “it doesn’t matter, you can still play well” by Farrell. Until Scotland can get their psyche in that square, they will carry on folding under extreme pressure…
2 Go to comments> We are having to adapt, evolve and innovate more than when we were in Super Rugby where there was only really one style that everybody had to play to gain the most success. Have = able to? Interesting what that one style might be? I thought SA sides still had bad tours now, or at least bad schedule, months away? Those extra few hours flights have to be a killer though, no surprise to see their sides doing so badly at the start of the season each year. I wouldn’t enjoy that unfairness as a supporter.
7 Go to commentsThe problem for NZ, and Aus, is they ripped up the SR model and lost a massive chunk of revenue that hasn’t been replaced. Don’t forget SA clubs went North because they were left with no choice, Argy unceremoniously binned and Japan cast adrift. Now SR wasn’t perfect, far from it, but they’ve jumped into something without an effective plan, so far, to replace what they’ve lost. The biggest revenue potential now lies in Japan but it won’t be easy or quick to unlock, they are incredibly insular in culture as a nation. In the meantime, there is a serious time bomb sitting under SH rugby and if it happens then the current financial challenges will look like a picnic. IF the Boks follow their provincial teams and head north then it’s revenue meltdown. Not guaranteed to happen but the status quo is a very odd hybrid, with the Boks pointing one way and the clubs pointing the other way. And for as long as that remains then the threat is real.
45 Go to commentsI think Etene has had some good tuition, likely while at the Warriors to be a professional that helped his rugby jump, but he was certainly thrown in the deep end way too early. Should have arguably 20 less SR caps, and therefor a way better record that he does at his age, but his development would have been fast tracked by the need to satiate his signing away from league. Again, credit to him and others that he has done it so well. Easy to fall over under that pressure in the big leagues like that but he kept at it when I myself wasn’t sure he was good enough.
1 Go to commentsAwesome story. I wonder what a bigger American (SA) scene might have mean for Brex.
1 Go to comments“Johnny McNicholl and the Crusaders” save a Penney. Who has been in camp this week and showed them how to play?
8 Go to commentsSo, reports of the Crusaders’ demise / terminal decline are perhaps just - slightly - premature/exaggerated…? 🤔 Will we see a deep-dive into that by the estimable Rugbypass scribes, and maybe one or two mea culpas? Thought not.
8 Go to comments1. The Chiefs are rudderless without DMac, which enhances his AB chances 2. Chiefs pack are powderpuffs. The hard men arent there anymore 3. They had their golden title chance last yr and wont threaten this yr. Gone in second round of playoffs.
8 Go to commentsHonestly, why did you have to publish such a foolish article the day they play us? 😂
45 Go to comments> They are not standalone entities. They are linked to an amateur association which holds the FFR licence that allows the professional side to compete in the league. That’s a great rule. This looks like the chicken or egg professional scenario. How long is it going to be before the club can break even (if that is even a thing in French rugby)? If the locals aren’t into well it would be good to se them drop to amateur level (is it that far?). Hope they can reset from this level and be more practical, there will be a time when they can rebuild (if France has there setup right).
1 Go to commentsWhat about changing the ball? To something heavier and more pointed that bounces unpredictably. Not this almost round football used these days.
35 Go to commentsThis is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?
35 Go to commentsWow, didn’t realise there was such apathy to URC in SA, or by Champions Cup teams. Just read Nick’s article on Crusaders, are Sharks a similar circumstance? I think SA rugby has been far more balanced than NZs, no?
4 Go to comments