Northern | US

Exclusion of Hutchinson and co is evidence of genuine Scottish strength in depth


Rory Hutchinson hasn't made the Scotland RWC squad
Comments
Comment

Fans are claiming positives about the depth of Scottish rugby in the wake of Gregor Townsend announcing his 31-man squad for the World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were some noticeable exclusions from the squad, namely Rory Hutchinson and Huw Jones in the centres and Matt Fagerson and Magnus Bradbury in the back row, which have vexed some fans. 

Hutchinson’s omission has caused the most outrage on social media, despite the centre only earning three caps. He has already won over many Scotland fans, particularly after last season with Northampton, and his ability to play centre or fly-half makes him a popular figure. However, Pete Horne, who is equally versatile, has been picked ahead of him. 

Fans are also shocked that Jones has failed to make the squad after being a focal point in Townsend’s teams so far during his tenure as head coach. Yet, while there are those that are not happy with these decisions, other fans are seeing the other side of the coin – that this selection is a sign of the alleged current strength in depth in Scottish rugby.

Some fans are saying this is the strongest squad in years, believing that Townsend must have had a real selection dilemma. In the case of the back row, while there are some players that are unlucky to miss out, the question would be who to drop to accommodate them. 

There are always going to be certain players that different fans do not want in the squad, but on the whole, it is understandable why Townsend has opted for every player he picked. Horne may be a controversial call, but he is versatile, experienced and has been tested by Townsend in the past. 

With Sam Johnson, Duncan Taylor and Chris Harris being the other centres in the squad, two good players were always going to miss out and some fans are enjoying the depth in that position. This is what has been said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/RugbyCath/status/1168881743530799105?s=20

https://twitter.com/Under_The_Frog/status/1168880917332598784?s=20

https://twitter.com/Thehairyhaggis/status/1168884956535410688?s=20

Having only made his Scotland debut just over two weeks ago, the 23-year-old Hutchinson’s rise in popularity has been staggering. But his form for the Saints last season was sensational, making the shortlist for the Premiership discovery of the year award. 

Hutchinson will no doubt be a reserve should an injury arise to someone in Japan, but this is one of a few players fans think should be part of the squad. 

ADVERTISEMENT

WATCH: Warren Gatland on why he believes Wales can win the 2019 World Cup

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close