English rugby's scrum-half problem and the hope the class of 2019 offers
Ever since Stuart Lancaster was appointed as the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) Head of Elite Player Development in 2008, English rugby has not had a problem producing talented youngsters ready to step up to the rigours and demands of professional rugby.
Lancaster’s work then, and the sizeable contributions of former England U18 coaching trio John Fletcher, Peter Walton and Russell Earnshaw, helped pave the way for the success England would go on to have at U20 level in the subsequent years, with many of those age-grade stars proceeding to form the core of the England squad that is about to head out to Japan for the Rugby World Cup.
The Premiership academies have made their own considerable contribution to that and the production level of players coming through the age-grade pathway and being able to offer impact at a senior international level has flourished as a result. If you want to quibble, you could still argue that the level of production falls below what it should be in a nation with England’s resources, both financially and in terms of its player pool and school system, although that is influenced by the eagerness to recruit from abroad at the senior level that the Premiership clubs have.
You can go through English rugby position by position and list exciting young talents coming through the system that can provide depth and competition to England’s current options. Whether that’s at lock, flanker, fly-half or wing, where the options are particularly numerous, or at tighthead, full-back or inside centre, where the stocks are steady, if not overflowing, the pathway has clearly been working.
There has been one position, however, where production has, for a number of reasons, not quite matched up. For all the other successes, the position of scrum-half has seemingly been left behind.
The relationship between Eddie Jones and his options at nine has been well-publicised over this Rugby World Cup cycle, although that is almost circumstantial to the issue. It demonstrates that there may be a problem but is not itself a reason for it or even indisputable proof of its existence.
Had there been a better stock of English scrum-halves for Jones to call on over the last three years, would those players have been given an opportunity? Or is his faith in Ben Youngs so absolute that even if a number of very promising players were knocking on the door over the past few seasons, they would still have been limited to a handful of bench appearances, such as Ben Spencer and Dan Robson have had?
Both players have had their advocates over the last couple of years, as does Danny Care, who played Youngs’ deputy initially, but ultimately there has been little planning put in place – in a game environment – for Youngs’ replacement, whether that is required in the short-term through injury or in a succession scenario during the next cycle. That has been Jones’ prerogative, although it doesn’t speak overly well of stocks at the position in England.
If that is not evidence enough, just take a look around the Premiership.
South Africans Faf de Klerk, Cobus Reinach and Francois Hougaard are all starters at their respective clubs, as are Nic White at Exeter Chiefs and Sonatane Takulua at recently relegated Newcastle Falcons. Kahn Fotuali’i dominated the position at Bath for a couple of seasons and Willi Heinz, who is English-qualified but arrived from the Crusaders in 2015, is the man in possession of the jersey at Gloucester.
Only Youngs, Care, Robson and Spencer have been consistent, established starting nines at their clubs in recent years, and who have also come through the English system. Harry Randall is beginning to emerge as the number one option at Bristol Bears and Will Chudley has made the departure of Fotuali’i at Bath possible, but for that number to be at 50% or lower in the Premiership, especially for such a specialist position, is disappointing.
There is still talent out there, such as Alex Mitchell at Northampton Saints and the Maunder brothers at Exeter, but it has found itself buried beneath talented and influential players like Reinach and White on the depth chart. No one wants young English players to be given a free ride, but with a second-tier competition that doesn’t match up to the one on offer in France and a less stringent policy on selecting homegrown players than their Celtic rivals, it could prove troublesome for England moving forward.
Of those English nines mentioned, Young and Care will be in their 30’s in the next cycle, as will Chudley and Heinz, whilst Mitchell has his work cut out displacing Reinach. The 22-year-old needs games to kick on, but he can’t get them for the form and impact of Reinach in the first XV. It’s a vicious circle.
With White set to head back to Australia, the path for Jack and Sam Maunder could open up in the south-west, something which the England coaches would be keen to see, as Spencer and Robson look particularly lonely as options moving ahead towards the 2023 Rugby World Cup in France.
The production of talent at the position, coupled with these extraneous variables, has simply meant that the pool of player there for Jones to build around after the upcoming Rugby World Cup is shallow to say the least. It’s not just an international issue, it’s an issue at the Premiership clubs, too, where the talent, the opportunity or a combination of the two hasn’t been there of late.
The good news? The class of 2019 could help buck that trend.
A total of six scrum-halves were contracted across the Premiership this summer and as crops go, it might be the best individual group of scrum-halves for the past decade.
Blake Boyland, Callum Pascoe and Raphael Quirke have been brought in at Bristol, Newcastle and Sale Sharks respectively, all of whom have England U18 experience, whilst Stephen Varney, an Italian U18 international, has also been signed up at Gloucester.
Leicester Tigers, who already boast Youngs, Sam Harrison, Ben White and Harry Simmons on their roster, have taken the rare move of contracting up two players at the position this summer, in the forms of Jonny Law and Jack van Poortvliet.
If the Miami Hurricanes are ‘Wide Receiver U’ in terms of American football, then Leicester have a strong claim on the title of ‘Scrum-Half School’ in rugby. To take on two specialists, whilst also having four seniors contracted, is a mark of the potential that both Law and van Poortvliet have.
It’s rich pickings at the position, something which has not always been true in recent years. Usually the next season of U20 scrum-halves are fairly easy to predict in England, although there is no end of combinations that could be used in 2020 as things stand.
Sam Maunder has another year of eligibility so should be in the group, unless Exeter opt to retain him for senior club action, but beyond that, it’s anyone’s guess. Law and Quirke were involved in the England U19 side that played Wales earlier this year, so they may have the advantage at this point, although Boyland, Pascoe and van Poortvliet offer plenty themselves. Varney does, too, though it would seem likely that he keeps on with his Italian affiliation next season or he could switch to Wales, for whom he also qualifies.
Of course, the talent and potential being there isn’t enough to assume this particular problem position will be solved in the coming years.
All six of these new professionals will have to deal with the transition to senior rugby this summer and the responsibilities and rigorous demands of being a professional athlete. It’s not a lifestyle that everyone takes to and the odds would say they aren’t all going to make it.
Then, should they manage the first part, they will then need to be given opportunities. Some clubs are better at this than others, some have a more impactful pathway through their Shield and Cup sides that better prepares youngsters, and some will recruit from abroad or rival Premiership clubs in order to provide short-term positive change, but in the process they’ll overload the depth chart ahead of these rookies.
It’s a hard balancing act to manage successfully and no one does it perfectly. However, the talent being there is something which should encourage English rugby fans, at the least.
With the raw materials not necessarily being there at this level or quantity in past seasons, even a low conversion rate in potential to ability at the senior level could see a couple of these players kick on and push for further honours. It’s a frustrating attrition rate, but that return would at least be an improvement on recent seasons.
All six have time on their side and there is no need to rush them through and overexpose them, but hopefully there will be an eagerness to get them involved as soon as possible – and as soon as is conducive to their development – as players can quickly stagnate when sitting unutilised.
It is one of the bigger problems in English rugby and that inability to push forward late developers and/or the players who aren’t immediately ready for senior action, is to the detriment of England’s enviable player pool.
If you begin to solve that, the sky is the limit.
Watch: RugbyPass exclusive – ‘The Academy’ – Part One
Comments on RugbyPass
1. The Chiefs are rudderless without DMac, which enhances his AB chances 2. Chiefs pack are powderpuffs. The hard men arent there anymore 3. They had their golden title chance last yr and wont threaten this yr. Gone in second round of playoffs.
1 Go to commentsHonestly, why did you have to publish such a foolish article the day they play us? 😂
30 Go to comments> They are not standalone entities. They are linked to an amateur association which holds the FFR licence that allows the professional side to compete in the league. That’s a great rule. This looks like the chicken or egg professional scenario. How long is it going to be before the club can break even (if that is even a thing in French rugby)? If the locals aren’t into well it would be good to se them drop to amateur level (is it that far?). Hope they can reset from this level and be more practical, there will be a time when they can rebuild (if France has there setup right).
1 Go to commentsWhat about changing the ball? To something heavier and more pointed that bounces unpredictably. Not this almost round football used these days.
35 Go to commentsThis is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?
35 Go to commentsWow, didn’t realise there was such apathy to URC in SA, or by Champions Cup teams. Just read Nick’s article on Crusaders, are Sharks a similar circumstance? I think SA rugby has been far more balanced than NZs, no?
2 Go to commentsBut here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.
30 Go to commentsIt could be coincidental or prescient that the All Blacks most dominant period under Steve Hansen was when the Crusaders had their least successful period under Todd Blackadder and then the positions reversed when Razor took over the Crusaders.
30 Go to commentsDefinitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.
3 Go to commentsSinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
2 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
30 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
30 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
30 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
30 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
55 Go to comments