Northern | US

Brumbies hit with injury to Wallaby prop Slipper

James Slipper of the Brumbies warms up ahead of the round four Super Rugby Pacific match between Highlanders and ACT Brumbies at Forsyth Barr Stadium, on March 16, 2024, in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

The ACT Brumbies’ best Super Rugby season in more than a decade has been dealt a blow with Wallabies prop James Slipper unlikely to feature in their upcoming quarter-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brumbies coach Stephen Larkham hoped Slipper would be back from a calf injury for a potential semi-final in two-and-a-half weeks, but there is only an “outside chance” the experienced forward could recover for the side’s home clash on June 8.

“Two to three (weeks) is the rough plan that we put together, so a fairly aggressive plan ahead to try and get him back,” Larkham said.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Slipper’s extensive experience will be sorely missed by the Brumbies in their final-round clash with the Western Force in Perth on Saturday.

He became the most-capped Australian in Super Rugby history earlier this season with his appearance against the Melbourne Rebels last time out his 183rd in the competition.

But the 34-year-old failed to see out the first half of the Brumbies’ 53-17 victory, hobbling off with soreness in his upper calf.

“He’s one of our mainstay forwards and brings a lot of leadership to the group. He has been playing exceptionally well,” Larkham said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Slipper’s injury brought back bad memories for Larkham, who was without fellow front-rower Allan Alaalatoa with a similar issue for extended periods of 2023.

“There is a lot of pressure that goes through front-rowers’ calves,” he said.

“Allan went through an arduous rehab program to get back into the position he’s in right now. It’s certainly not as bad as Allan’s, but we’re hoping that we can get a quick turnaround on it.

“It’s a really tricky position to be in. A front-rower with a calf injury is something that’s very tricky to rehab.”

Strength in depth has been key to the third-placed Brumbies’ success this year.

Larkham can call on yet another Wallaby prop in the form of Blake Schoupp to fill Slippers’ shoes, as the 26-year-old makes a fortuitously timed return from a shoulder injury.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s back into the fray this weekend so a great opportunity for him to get a bit of form before we get into finals,” Larkham said.

The Brumbies still have a shot of finishing the competition atop the ladder, depending on results elsewhere.

Even if they fail to beat the Force their 11 wins and two losses so far already seals their best regular-season return in two decades.

Regardless of where the Brumbies finish on the ladder after Saturday’s game, plenty of work lies ahead if they are to claim their first title since 2004.

“The way that we play this weekend will impact the way that we’re playing next weekend,” Larkham said.

“Whether we need to win or don’t need to win any of those distractions are not front and centre of the players’ minds. They’re thinking about how they can perform best.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 17 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close