Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Bristol's defending delights Pat Lam in battling win over Saracens

By PA
Bristol Bears v Saracens – Gallagher Premiership – Ashton Gate

Pat Lam praised Bristol’s battling qualities after seeing them move second in the Gallagher Premiership.

ADVERTISEMENT

A 77th-minute penalty try, awarded when Saracens captain and England hooker Jamie George illegally entered a ruck on Saracens’ line, meant Bristol triumphed 16-12 at Ashton Gate.

George was also yellow-carded, and Bristol held on to clinch the win following a largely forgettable contest that saw more than 30 penalties awarded.

Video Spacer

Owen Farrell opens up on mental health.

Video Spacer

Owen Farrell opens up on mental health.

“I am extremely pleased,” Bristol boss Lam said.

“It wasn’t beautiful weather, but if we want to be where we are going, you have to get excited by playing how you have to play.

“Things like the weather were in Saracens’ favour with the pack they had picked, and we didn’t have as much time on the ball.

“But our defence and our scrummaging were huge. Credit to our coaches for that.

“The boys gutsed it out. We hung on in there in the end.

“Good teams when they need to defend, they defend. Everyone knows us for our attack – but we want to get our defence right, too.”

It looked as if Alex Goode, deputising at fly-half for Owen Farrell, had kicked Saracens home with four penalties.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bristol also had to survive a late Saracens onslaught following their replacement prop Max Lahiff’s sin-binning.

But they prevailed courtesy of three Callum Sheedy penalties and the seven-point penalty try, denying Saracens a 10th Premiership win before their relegation to the Championship next term.

Saracens rugby director Mark McCall admitted a sense of frustration after seeing his team come unstuck.

“It is always frustrating to come out the wrong side,” McCall said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But it was a game that could have gone either way. Our attitude was good, out physicality and energy was good.

“But our set-piece wasn’t good enough and we had countless chances five metres from their line.”

England star Farrell, meanwhile, could be in the mix for next Saturday’s Premiership appointment with Harlequins.

Farrell sat out the Bristol encounter due to a thigh issue, but McCall added: “It’s a very minor strain, so there is a good chance he will play next week.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby
Search