Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The All Blacks Are Doing To Other Teams What France Did To Them In 1999

By Jamie Wall
Julian Savea. Photo / Getty Images.

Their record winning streak was built on intense 20-minute scoring blitzes, something the All Blacks were on the receiving end of in one of their most famous losses, writes Jamie Wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

The last Bledisloe Cup test at Eden Park looked, for a while at least, like the closest the All Blacks were going to be pushed so far in 2016. In fact, were it not for a dubious no try call from the TMO, the result may well have been quite different.

Had Henry Speight’s try been allowed to stand the scores would have been tied at 15-15 with the kick to come. Instead when Nigel Owens blew his whistle for full time 20 minutes later, the final score had blown out to 37-10 to the All Blacks.

The Wallabies are in good company when it comes to this phenomenon in 2016. Wales were up 18-15 at halftime at Eden Park in the first test in June. In Hamilton, Los Pumas found themselves trailing by only 24-19 well into the second half. At Kings Park in Durban the Springboks would have been feeling quietly confident when they were down just 22-15.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1475535264″]

The final scores were 39-21 over the Welsh, 54-22 over Los Pumas, and, in a performance being talked about as their finest ever, the All Blacks beat the Springboks 57-15.

All it took was a brief but brutal onslaught for the All Blacks to take any shred of respectability out of the scoreline. Wales found out when they conceded 24 points in 15 minutes. The Argentines tried in vain to stem five tries in just over 20 minutes. The Springboks watched their chance of beating the All Blacks evaporate as the visitors ran in six tries in 25 minutes.

Scoring a bunch of points quickly and then closing the game out isn’t exactly a revolutionary gameplan – it’s probably the basis of most coaches’ pre-game speeches all over the world. But the All Blacks should have special reason to be the masters of completely blitzing opponents out of nowhere: they were the most famous victims of it back in 1999.

ADVERTISEMENT

France’s fabled second half blitz in the World Cup semifinal at Twickenham remains a very sore point in All Black history. Described as 20 minutes that sunk the hopes of an entire nation and cost the job of then-coach John Hart, the reality is it was only around five (Dominici’s and then Dourthe’s tries straight after one another is what killed the All Blacks; Bernat-Salles’ one 10 minutes later was completely against the run of play). Despite having almost complete domination of territory and possession in the match, the All Blacks came up well short.

It might be drawing a long bow to put the All Blacks game plan of 2016 solely down to this experience 17 years ago, but it’s a nice bit of symmetry to think that some of their winning ways came from a lesson learned in their most famous loss.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 22 minutes ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 3 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 9 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’ All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’
Search