Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Ali Williams: We need to support our referees

By Ali Williams

77-Test All Black Ali Williams gives his take on today’s referees and how we can support them moving forward in his exclusive RugbyPass column.

ADVERTISEMENT

We’ve all got our views on the June Test series. Is it beneficial for teams and players? Does the timing work? Is it financially viable? These are all questions that we find ourselves constantly asking after the June series.

We’ve also all got our own views on the referees, with plenty of tough calls being made over the break that could have gone either way.

Let’s look at it in terms of the referee’s position. I personally would ask the question, are we genuinely giving enough support and encouragement to the referees?

From a players’ – or ex-players’ – point of view, I personally don’t think that we have given the referees enough support as the game has moved into the professional era. I think that there are a few paths that we can potentially go down from here in order to better provide that support.

Firstly, we can take a big step back and just let the officials referee what they see, let them understand the game and its momentum. Or, we can go down the same route the likes of cricket, tennis and sailing have gone down, where it’s all about artificial intelligence.

The technology is out there where the referees should literally be able to – in any scenario of the game – take angles and data to say ‘yes, he did tackle him high’ or ‘yes, he did take him off the ground’, as seen with the bowling lines and predictive technology in cricket. Are we able to bring that into the game? If we bring that into the game I don’t have an issue with it. It would be full and final and it would give the referees the support they need.

ADVERTISEMENT

Upon implementing that, you’re going to attract more referees into the game and that is where they can really focus on the element of protecting kids and making the game safer, which to me is great and I support that angle.

However, I think we’ve also got to weigh up whether we go the other way and just say hold on, we want to keep up with tradition in rugby. The referee’s decision remains final and we accept that he’s going to make some mistakes. He’s going to get some things right and might get a few things wrong or interpret some things differently, but that’s what he sees and at the end of the day, he’s the one with the whistle in his hand.

Of the current crop of referees, I think the guy that handles the game the best is Nigel Owens. Purely because he feels and understands the players’ positions because he has made himself vulnerable in his own personal position.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before Owens, the guy that really resonated with me was Paddy O’Brien. He understood what was at stake in any given game. Whether it was a Ranfurly Shield challenge, if it was an All Black trial, or if it was an All Blacks Test, he knew what to expect in every scenario and how to handle the heated moments.

I personally would like to know how referees are mandated by World Rugby. As with any job, you are given a certain level of authority. At times it can be tough to determine where that authority lies with our referees.

Are World Rugby asking referees to aid the growth strategy of the game by reffing our game in a manner that will help grow kids’ rugby, grow rugby around the world, and break down some of those barriers to entry around the physical side of the game?

If so, that’s fine, and you can potentially see refereeing heading down that track with where the high tackle law is going, and where punishment for aerial play has gone. It’s clear that we are now geared more towards player safety above all else.

As we have seen over the past few weeks, the stance has been that if someone is in the air, they are vulnerable and we don’t want you to touch them because it can end in disaster.

At present I think it’s actually our referees that are too vulnerable. There’s too much ability for a team, a coach, or a player to come out and say that the ref got it right or wrong.

This would almost be erased if the predictive technology was developed to aid the referee in his decision making.

Take the forward pass rule for example. At this stage, they should literally have a line that shoots out showing the path of the ball. Yes or no. It’s standard, you’ve got your angles and that is it. There are no more questions about it. Media then don’t have to drum up stuff around decisions.

We need to escape the in-between we are stuck in with modern refereeing.

All we are doing right now is making it hard for referees to want to do their jobs.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Trevor 2 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 6 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It's an All Black discussion': The pair of young Hurricanes tipped for black jerseys The pair of young Hurricanes tipped for black jerseys
Search