Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'A complex and emotive process': World Rugby backs guidelines to exclude transgender women from elite competitions

By Online Editors
Black Fern Renee Wickliffe scores a try in their 47-10 win over the Wallaroos in 2019. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

World Rugby has become the first global sports federation to recommend that transgender women do not participate in the elite and international levels of the women’s game.

ADVERTISEMENT

The organisation published a statement on Saturday that, while not strictly banning their inclusion in elite teams, recommended they be excluded “on safety grounds”.

However, national unions have been allowed to make their own policy decisions at the community level of the game while transgender men remain permitted to play men’s contact rugby in all forms.

Video Spacer

Dave Rennie, Harry Wilson and Folau Fainga’a speak to media ahead of Wallabies clash

Video Spacer

Dave Rennie, Harry Wilson and Folau Fainga’a speak to media ahead of Wallabies clash

The organisation’s new policy comes after what it describes as a “comprehensive, collaborative and inclusive review” of existing guidance that concluded that “safety and fairness cannot presently be assured for women competing against transwomen in contact rugby”.

It added it was committed to “regularly reviewing the guidance to monitor and consider any new evidence or research”.

“This has been a complex and emotive process, but a necessary one,” said Dr Araba Chintoh, who chaired the review.

“We set out to determine whether it would be possible to maintain inclusion in contact rugby based on the available research and evidence and rugby’s unique context of combining strength, power, speed and endurance in a physical, collision environment.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As we progressed through a comprehensive and inclusive review, it became clear there are compelling evidenced safety considerations which we simply cannot ignore.

“Unions will be able to exercise flexibility on a case-by-case basis at the community level of the game, for which the unions are responsible, while World Rugby will continue to prioritise inclusion strategies to ensure that the trans community remain an active, welcome and important member of the rugby family.”

World Rugby chairman Sir Bill Beaumont added: “Rugby is a welcoming and inclusive sport and, while this has been a difficult decision to make, it has been taken following comprehensive consultation and engagement and for the right reasons, given the risk of injury.

“That said, we recognise that the science continues to evolve, and we are committed to regularly reviewing these guidelines, always seeking to be inclusive.”

ADVERTISEMENT

World Rugby’s previous transgender policy followed the International Olympic Committee’s policy, which currently states that transgender women must suppress testosterone levels for at least 12 months before competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 16 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain? Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain?
Search