Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby Men's Rankings winners and losers in 2025

Earl played a leading role in England's memorable victory over New Zealand (Photo Rob Newell - CameraSport via Getty Images)

The World Rugby Rankings have taken on added importance this year given their role in devising the seedings for the Rugby World Cup 2027 Draw, which can be watched live from Sydney on RugbyPass TV this Wednesday (09:00 GMT).

ADVERTISEMENT

Take England, for example. They started the year on the back foot, lying in seventh after an underwhelming set of results in 2024, and outside of the top band and facing a tougher RWC 2027 pool unless things improved.

And improve they did. Steve Borthwick’s side are currently on an 11-match winning run, dating back to the very first game of the year, a 27-22 defeat to Ireland in Dublin, and have surged up to third in the world, securing their place in the top band of seeds as a result.

VIDEO

While Chile have matched England’s four-place rise up the rankings in 2025, going from 21st at the start of the year to an all-time high of 17th, none of the teams who’ve qualified for RWC 2027 have added as many points to their rating as England.

RWC 2027 Draw

England kicked off the year with a rating of 82.31 points and that has soared to 89.41 – an increase of 7.1 points. Chile’ rating went up by exactly five points to 66.72, which was enough for them to climb into band three for their second Rugby World Cup.

Like Chile, 14th-ranked Uruguay are currently at their highest-ever position, having gained three places, while fast-improving Spain have moved from 18th to 15th, after gains of 2.13 and 3.03 points, respectively.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the flipside, Samoa started 2025 ranked 14th and with designs on a place in band two. However, a winless Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup campaign and a series of RWC qualifier failures led to the Pacific Islanders falling five places to a record low of 19th, putting them in band four for Wednesday’s draw.

The spectacular loss of 6.25 points from their rating is unmatched by any team in the world’s top 25. Portugal, however, have retreated alarmingly, with the euphoria of their successful RWC 2023 campaign well and truly extinguished.

Os Lobos had to settle for a disappointing fourth place in the Rugby Europe Men’s Championship and have continued to struggle since, leading to a four-place fall to 20th and the loss of 3.84 points.

Higher up, Ireland and France were the only teams in band one to lose both places and points. Having entered the year second only to South Africa, Ireland are down to fourth with 2.81 points knocked off their rating, which now stands at 87.97 points. Six Nations winners France have fallen to fifth with a revised rating of 87.24 points.

ADVERTISEMENT

World Rankings changes – Jan 1, 2025 to now

POSN TEAMSTARTENDDIFF
1 (-)S AFRICA92.7893.94+1.16
2 (+1)N ZEALAND90.3390.36+0.03
3 (+4)ENGLAND82.3189.41+7.1
4 (-2)IRELAND90.7887.97-2.81
5 (-1)FRANCE88.5187.24-1.27
6 (-1)ARGENTINA84.9784.970
7 (+1)AUSTRALIA81.5281.53+0.01
8 (+1)FIJI80.0781.14+1.07
9 (-3)SCOTLAND83.3480.22-3.12
10 (-)ITALY78.6478.98+0.34
11 (-)WALES74.0174.23+0.22
12 (+1)JAPAN72.9574.09+1.14
13 (-1)GEORGIA73.8573.18-0.67
14 (+3)URUGUAY67.0669.19+2.13
15 (+3)SPAIN65.9869.01+3.03
16 (-1)USA70.0268.26-1.76
17 (+4)CHILE61.7266.72+5.00
18 (+1)TONGA65.4666.66+1.20
19 (-5)SAMOA72.6866.43-6.25
20 (-4)PORTUGAL68.8264.98-3.84
21 (+7)BELGIUM56.5162.32+5.81
22 (-2)ROMANIA63.0161.5-1.51
23 (-1)HK CHINA59.4959.61+0.12
24 +2)ZIMBABWE57.1658.8+1.64
25 (-2)CANADA59.1858.76-0.42

Related


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
P
Poorfour 46 days ago

It’s surprising that the article doesn’t mention Scotland who in absolute terms have experienced the third biggest drop in both points and position, but more importantly are the only Tier 1 team to drop into a lower pool.


That said, it’s probably reflective less of Scotland’s own performances (though a top pool position was certainly within their grasp against NZ and Argentina) than England reversing the drop in their position from last year’s string of narrow losses in the summer and AIs. Which, if you’re a Scotland fan, must make it all the more galling.

S
SB 47 days ago

Belgium showing their development.

M
Mikewoott 47 days ago

“Six Nations Grand Slam Winners France”! Last time I checked, England beat France to start their 11-match unbeaten run 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

J
Jon 47 days ago

Brain freeze!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 14 minutes ago
Jeff Wilson: 'They didn't play with a great deal of confidence'

Agree Robertson failed badly. But you don’t give him enough credit for the reformation he was undertaking. Perhaps it was a Crusader plan - but why is that a negative - he won 7 Super Championships with it - it would be surprising if he did not look to build a team around a plan that had that level of success. But it was in any event directed to meeting a hard fact - ABs had fallen well behind the power and intensity of SA and France, and latterly England. For too long the ABs had become over reliant on a smash and grab all of game counter attack. By stark contrast Robertson was focused on building structured power game where he could rely on set piece dominance and synchronised attacking structures. At one level it produced a remarkable statistic - 87 % of tries scored from set piece and within the red zone. Of course the negative flip side is the almost total absence of counter attack. But perhaps more importantly Razor was visibly reshaping the forwards - he could now assemble a starting and impact pack to rival the gargantuan packs of SA and France for the full 80 minutes involving among other things a three lock second row strategy with Vaa’i and Holland playing 6 when fit that when deployed never went backwards including against the Boks and 6-2 French impact packs. His greatest failure in my view is that he was too conservative and did not fully implement this structured power game and go 6-2 especially against the English who had already mastered what NB has called “periodising” - the art of maximising intensity at key times. The loss against them was highly predictable because of it. But it is simply wrong to say that Razor did not innovate - he did but as you say lacked the confidence or ability to get his team to fully implement. Razor also clearly had the insight that if he did not build the Black Crusaders the ABs were are serious risk of free fall. A stark statistic in this regard is that the tier one team with the bigger combined start and impact packs measured by collective weight and height won all games against other tier one teams last year including the ABs v SA at Eden Park, the Boks in Wellington, Paris and Dublin and the English in London. Finally, Razor this year achieved the best win % improvement of all tier one teams last except England (and they did not play the Boks) and the ABs was the only tier one team to beat the Boks. So yeah he deserves some some credit.

PS I am not a Crusader fan and looking forward to Joseph taking over.



...

6 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT