Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Worcester MP 'grateful' government placed Warriors into administration

By PA
Worcester Warriors (Photo by PA)

Worcester MP Robin Walker says the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport acted on “concerns of fans, staff and players” by placing Worcester Warriors into administration.

ADVERTISEMENT

He had previously called for that course of action alongside fellow Worcestershire MPs Harriett Baldwin, Rachel Maclean, Mark Garnier and Sajid Javid.

Walker also pushed the case in a parliamentary adjournment debate last week, and has had contact with both consortiums that have expressed interest in buying the Gallagher Premiership club out of administration.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I am grateful that DCMS have listened to and acted on the concerns of fans, staff and players at the Warriors and the many teams that they support,” he said.

“Securing the future of Sixways is a priority for us all, and I am profoundly grateful for the support of all my Worcestershire colleagues in Parliament, local councils and so many constituents.

“I know that this must still be a deeply worrying time for all the staff at Sixways and every fan that loves this club.

“It is clear that the administrators will have the whole rugby world urging them to succeed.”

Worcester have been suspended from all competitions with immediate effect after failing to meet a Rugby Football Union deadline requesting proof of insurance cover and funding for the club’s monthly payroll.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Warriors’ debts total more than £25million, including at least £6m in unpaid tax.

The club’s former chief executive Jim O’Toole, who is heading one of the interested consortiums, believes that ownership of land at Sixways is a crucial factor for any prospective buyer.

The Sixways site comprises more than 50 acres, and O’Toole told BBC Hereford & Worcester: “The land has to be part of it – simple as that.

“It’s all about who owns the land, and whether the administrator – in doing their due diligence and forensic accounting – finds out what exactly happens to the assets and the liabilities.

“That is going to be the absolute key to this. We can’t run a rugby club without a pitch, a back car park and the fan-zone.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Not only for the operation of the business, but for the longer-term and bigger-picture commercial development that will fund the club on a more sustainable footing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 14 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

20 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes for Force All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes
Search