Northern | US

Why the World Cup trophy should be renamed after the late Jonah Lomu


Lomu and Umaga of the All Blacks lead the team out for the match. (Photo by Mark Leech/Getty Images)
Comments
13 Comments

Preeminent sports journalist Jamie Wall caused a stir in the New Zealand Rugby News recently when he suggested the William Webb Ellis trophy, awarded to the winning team of the men’s Rugby World Cup, should be renamed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wall wrote. “For those who don’t know, William Webb Ellis was a pupil of Rugby School in England and picked up the ball and ran with it during a game of soccer, thus inadvertently inventing the game we know as rugby today. Or, as other telling’s go, during a game that more resembled forceback. Or something like that. There is no hard evidence that Webb Ellis ever actually did that, nor that any event ever occurred.”

Wall went on to suggest that a fanciful origin story that’s easily picked apart and retold is not an issue, but what Webb Ellis represents is not reflective of what the game is today.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The gentlemen of the 19th century needed a way to differentiate their sport from everything else, so to have rugby born in an upper-class English school tied it forever to the notion of amateurism and the idea that it should be run by the sort of folks who attended said schools.

“Which was at least logical until rugby went professional almost 30 years ago,” Wall argued.

Wall didn’t address who the Rugby World Cup should be renamed after if Webb Ellis were to be cancelled.

The idea of the Rugby World Cup was mooted as early as the middle of the 20th century. Harold Tolhurst, a Wallaby who later became a test referee said that he suggested a Rugby World Cup in the late fifties.

In 1979 Bill McLaughin president of the Australian Rugby Union suggested a World Cup in 1988, the year of his country’s bicentenary celebrations.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1982, Neil Durden-Smith, an Englishman who had been the aide to the governor-general in New Zealand, suggested a Rugby World Cup be played in the British Isles in 1985 or 1986.

It wasn’t until June 1983 the idea gained real momentum. Australia formally proposed a World Cup and put itself as host in 1988. New Zealand put forward its case forward in 1984 which resulted in the IRB initiating a World Cup feasibility study.

New Zealand and Australia joined forces with Australian Nicholas Shehadie, a former Wallaby who became the Lord Mayor of Sydney, and Bay of Plenty Kiwi Richard Littlejohn driving tournament organisation.

The IRB met again in Paris on 20-21 March 1985. England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales opposed the World Cup. Australia, New Zealand, France, and South Africa, banned from competing because of apartheid, were in favour leaving a stalemate. Dramatically, John Kendall-Carpenter of England broke ranks and voted for the World Cup, and following this, the Welsh vote also moved.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kendall-Carpenter, capped 23 times by England, subsequently became Chairman of the IRB organising committee.

Would these pioneering visionary’s and administrators be more appropriate names for the World Cup trophy than Webb Ellis?

The first World Cup was a start, but it was hardly a roaring success. Many fixtures failed to sell out and there were numerous teething issues. The first tournament is almost unrecognisable from the behemoth of today.

In terms of selling a tournament the Webb-Ellis myth is a far more appealing and convenient narrative than a bunch of squabbling fish heads finally convincing an apathetic world body to get the thing over the line.

Its the players that create the most inspiring, memorable, and enduring legacies in World Cup tournaments. Any reference to the Football World Cup invariably leads to discussions about Pele, Maradona, or Geoff Hurt.

What player should the Rugby World Cup be named after?

Jonah Lomu is the player most synonymous with the World Cup. The beastly All Black winger scored a record 15 tries in two tournaments. More than that his unusual size, devastating power, and searing speed captured the imagination of the world and put rugby on the map in a way it never had been before.

Lomu was on billboards in Germany, offered NFL contracts in America, and was paid mega bucks to speak to car companies in Japan. His running over of Englishmen Mike Catt in the 1995 semi-final in Cape Town is arguably the most iconic moment in World Cup history. Rugby’s pathway to professionalism would have lacked significant momentum without the staggering impact of Jonah.

The Northern Hemisphere might grizzle they have no representation on the trophy. Johnny Wilkinson would be a worthy name to share alongside Jonah. The English champion played four World Cups famously kicking a drop goal off his wrong foot in extra time to help England beat Australia 20-17 in the 2003 final. There hasn’t been a more popular or better Northern Hemisphere player in World Cup history than Johnny.

Lomu and Wilkinson. Two champions with different skin colours from both hemispheres instantly recognised for their outstanding contributions to actual World Cup history surely carries more weight and relevance than a 200-year-old schoolboy fairy tale.

 

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

13 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

E
EvilMockingJay 1 hour ago
Antoine Dupont missing for now as Galthie names 33-man France squad

Well, he’s returning from an heavy injury, and still fresh compared to all the other 9 of top14. I know he made a super perf against Racing92 but, on the season ? Lucu, Le Garrec, Serin, Jauneau, Couilloud, and of course Graou did more for their teams. It’s “easier” for him to do ONE big perf, while all the other 9 were the best players of their team during the whole season, and he did that with a forward pack being a lot stronger and less tired than the Racing one.

Now had he played for all the season without a bulldozer pack like Toulouse one… maybe he would have being far less interesting against Racing92. I'm not saying is not a good player. Not at all. But, in my opinion, this season is really not the season to call him “best 9 in the world”. Not even best 9 in France… which, again, is normal because he was heavly injured, it’s even awesome is still capable of playing. And for these reasons, i'm thinking that Galthié should do without him with France group. A place in the squad is not a given, even for the former best player in the world. If another player with his number is generally better and in better form, he is the one who should be given the jersey. Dupont should take the time to really get back to full fitness (50’ by match with his club is not enough for international standards) before giving him back the blue jersey. + We need to stop that “Dupont dependence” or during the next big competition, *someone* is gonna destroy him. Again.



...

73 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close