Northern | US

‘We want the best athletes’: NRL chief insists rugby raids will be fair on clubs


Mark Nawaqanitawase with ball in hand for the Wallabies. Photo by SANKA VIDANAGAMA/AFP via Getty Images
Comments
Comment

NRL chief Andrew Abdo insists any salary-cap exemptions to attract players from rival codes would be implemented fairly, as league bosses eye off potential incentives for a looming raid on rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ARL Commission is expected to discuss potential options for exemptions at next month’s meeting, with Rugby Australia bosses admitting a horror World Cup has left them vulnerable.

During a dramatic 2023, Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii has been successfully lured to the 15-man game, Eddie Jones has come and gone as Wallabies coach, and the likes of Cameron Murray have opted to stay put in rugby league.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But there is the potential of the NRL striking back.

The Sydney Roosters are reportedly in talks with Wallabies winger Mark Nawaqanitawase, while NSW Waratahs teenager Max Jorgensen has long been a target for the NRL.

“We want the best athletes playing our game, whether that’s the men’s or women’s competition,” Abdo said.

“Growth is on our agenda, so while our primary focus is developing rugby league talent through our own pathways, we’re also open to attracting and, potentially in some cases, returning to league from other codes.

Related

“Would salary-cap relief be potentially used? Yes.

“That’s an absolute possibility that the commission will consider, and consider in due course.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Getting that right, while appeasing all 17 clubs with a level playing field, stands as the NRL’s biggest challenge.

Salary-cap exemptions are already in place for developed players and veterans, with up to 10 per cent of their salaries wiped off the cap to a maximum of $300,000 per club per year.

A similar system could potentially be put in place for players who have been signed from rival codes.

“Any change the commission might make to that policy will have to be very carefully considered, and there will be parameters and caps,” Abdo said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It won’t be a free-for-all.

“It will be delicate and it will be about making sure there’s an opportunity for all clubs on an equal basis to have one or two talented players that they recruit potentially from other codes around the world.

“It’ll be carefully considered though, because we do want to make sure that we focus on our pathways, and we also want to maintain competitive balance.”

Abdo’s comments came as Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh conceded his ailing code needed to win back the faith of the players after the Wallabies’ disastrous group-stage exit at the World Cup.

“We talk about building trust and connection. We’ve lost a lot of trust with the playing group as well,” Waugh said on Tuesday.

“The experience that they had this year with the Wallabies at the World Cup, compared to what they would have envisaged going into the World Cup, might have been very different.

Related

“So it’s really important for us to build a system that’s attractive for them to be a part of.

“Right now where we are in the cycle with the (British and Irish) Lions and the home World Cup (looming in 2025 and 2027 respectively), it’s the perfect opportunity for us to rebuild the game.

“But we need to build that trust of the players.”

Meanwhile, Abdo said the ARL Commission would determine the next steps on the league’s own expansion in coming months.

A Papua New Guinea team based out of Cairns is favoured to be the 18th NRL side, from as early as 2027.

“We haven’t concluded yet on when expansion will take place,” Abdo said.

“More preparation is better. You want players that have signed multi-year contracts to have the opportunity to transition to a new team.

“You also want pathways set up and high performance and a stable, strong environment with the right personnel for as long as possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 17 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close