Northern | US

'We can actually give it': The confidence Australia have taken from England loss

SALFORD, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 12: Siokapesi Palu Sekona of Australia takes on Natasha Hunt of England during the WXV Global Series match between England Red Roses and Australia on September 12, 2026 in Salford, England. (Photo by Lewis Storey/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)
Comments
4 Comments

Wallaroos captain Siokapesi Palu stated that her team were “super-stoked” at full-time of their 48-15 loss to England in Salford.

ADVERTISEMENT

At half-time of their WXV Global Series 2026 opener against the Women’s Rugby World Cup 2026 champions, it was Australia who led 10-5. It was the first time that the Red Roses had gone in at the break behind their opponents since 2020.

A Samantha Wood penalty and converted Faliki Pohiva try handed the Wallaroos a midway lead, with England’s sole effort coming from player of the match Abi Burton.

VIDEO

Australia’s lead was also a result of their physicality. For the first 40 minutes, their more experienced pack made life tough in the loose and at the set-piece. It was a more than warranted lead.

In the second half, England did what they do best and scored seven tries to pull well clear of Australia.

“We’re super-stoked,” Palu said at full-time. “I don’t think that score’s a reflection of the game we produced.

“We didn’t finish the way we wanted to. We’ll take a lot of positives. That’s the first time England have had to trail since 2020, I believe.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re going to take a lot of confidence. Against a world-class team like that, we can actually give it. For us, it’s just trying to string along the full 80-minute game so that we can actually compete.”

Australia’s confidence is well-founded. A year ago, when the two teams met at Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025, the Wallaroos did score first in Brighton but failed to land any sort of significant blow as the Red Roses ran out 47-7 winners.

Related

For Australia, there is plenty of immediate improvement too. It was only a couple of weeks ago that the Black Ferns ran riot in Auckland to pick up a 66-19 win in the second Laurie O’Reilly Cup match of 2026.

“We responded so much better in that game than we did against the Black Ferns,” she said. “We know what to fix. We’ve just got to string it along.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You could see glimpses of it in the first half. We really took it to them. For us, it’s just belief and just making sure that we can compete.”

Now both teams will go their separate ways. Next weekend, England have a Women’s Rugby World Cup final replay with Canada. The Wallaroos play France and then Scotland. They will also host the Scots for a two-Test series on home soil.

World Rugby Rankings now in the RugbyPass App

NEW IN THE APP: Official World Rugby Rankings hub! Compare team rankings side-by-side, with data going back 20 years.

Download the RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
B
BC1812 29 days ago

A poor England still scored over 40 points in 40 minutes. Is that progress? Or wishFu thinking?

K
KelFB 30 days ago

For a bit of perspective, the Wallaroos are substantially under resourced compared to the Red Roses, don’t play anywhere near as much top flight rugby and had been without a head coach for nearly 18 months. Add to that they had a disappointing PAC4 series and got belted by NZ a few weeks ago. Leading the Red Roses into half time was a huge achievement. As always though when they play the big 4, disparities in strength and fitness inevitably take their toll and games get away from them. I thought that first 40 min against England was some of the best rugby i’ve seen the Wallaroos play.

u
unknown 30 days ago

‘Super stoked’ ?? It looked like they were blowing out of their backsides after half time. They clearly need to work on their fitness, and not just a little bit.

T
Two Cents 30 days ago

There's practically no value in extolling how well you did for 30 minutes when the match runs for 80 minutes.


It shows a lack of perspective and an inability to realize that managing to be physical and high tempo for a fraction of the game means nothing when you then completely collapse in the second half.


It's not about “stringing it together” for 80 minutes. It's about delivering for the full match, not just for fleeting moments.


“Stringing it together" sounds like a cop out where you're trying to convey the sense that you're just casually not far from the level when actually you've barely shifted from where you were at 8 years ago.


After everyone of these matches it's always “We were great for 30 minutes. Now we just need to be able to do it for the full 80 to be competitive.”


They've literally been saying the exact same thing for the last 4 years and yet nothing's changed. Why should anyone believe them now?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close