Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Is it time for England to move away from George Ford?

By Ben Smith
Should England move away from George Ford?

Eddie Jones has persisted with a Ford & Farrell partnership for most of his reign as England’s coach. It has been a maligned arrangement that is now well and truly under the microscope following another loss and series defeat in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The winning streak papered over attacking inefficiencies of the England team and fans and pundits were willing to gloss over shortcomings. On the back of a sixth consecutive loss and conceding an unassailable 2-0 lead to South Africa, Jones must change directions or risk losing his job.

The team is regressing quickly, heading on a crash course towards an early World Cup exit. This pack is ill-disciplined, fatigued and sloppy. They have conceded penalties at the wrong times in this South Africa series for all three of those reasons. Compounding matters are the decision makers, just when they have South Africa on the ropes they shelve the cue and revert back to ineffective tactics.

George Ford was masterful in the opening stages of both games, laying on beautiful passes and attacking the line. He was largely involved in all of England’s opening tries, which helped build quick leads.

Ford’s problem is he vanishes from the game just as quickly, failing to maintain control with tactically poor decisions.

With momentum swings flowing against England, they just need to hold the ball when they get possession back. Instead, they throw possession away with poor kicking, asking for more Springbok punishment.

Great sides find a weakness and then go after that weakness relentlessly. England could not be stopped with width and clinical passing early in both games. They looked far better with ball in hand, stretching to the edges. Despite finding South Africa’s weakness, they continued to revert back to conservative rugby. George Ford and Elliot Daly were instrumental in throwing these games away by failing to make good decisions around when to kick and when not to, and failing to execute effectively when they did make the right decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ford proved he is a skillful playmaker with excellent passing and timing that England can build the attack around. The problem has been managing the flow of the game and maintaining control. It is either Eddie Jones’s game plan or Ford’s inability to read the situation.

With the series lost and the third test an opportunity to experiment, there are two potential changes England can make. They have the best ball-playing 10 in the Premiership in Danny Cipriani available and the current Premiership winning 10 in Owen Farrell.

England could continue with the double-barrelled playmaker approach with Cipriani elevated to the starting lineup while Farrell sticks to 12. The Gloucester-bound flyhalf is a possession-based player, who is a natural passer with a Midas touch. At Wasps, he played his best rugby in a ball-retention system with limited kicking duties.

Cipriani’s first touch of his 12-minute cameo in the second test was a line break assist in the midfield, effortlessly putting Daly into the clear, where Daly blew a certain try by not passing. He followed that up with more attacking intent, probing the line and facilitating runners. He even floated out wider to allow Farrell to play his natural game at first receiver.

ADVERTISEMENT

This combination looked promising for a few fleeting minutes and is worth exploring more over 80 minutes. With Cipriani adept at manipulating overlaps on the edge, Farrell can get closer to the action and play a lot more first receiver than he does with Ford.

Farrell is more than capable with the kicking duties, allowing Cipriani to play similar to his role at Wasps.

The second option is to give Farrell the reigns at 10 and bring in a crash-and-bash type of 12 but with a lack of them in this squad, it will be difficult. Henry Slade and Alex Lozowski are not that type of midfielder. The best option with this squad appears to be starting Cipriani at 10 with Farrell at 12, but playing a flexible game with Cipriani as a quasi-fullback in attack.

Eddie Jones described the second test as a horror movie on re-run. If he wants to miss the third instalment he needs to change up the script and the cast.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

2 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 5 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 11 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa
Search