Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The 'smallest budget' reminder Pat Lam has on Bristol office wall

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by PA)

Don’t talk to Bristol boss Pat Lam about the alleged hardships of Gallagher Premiership clubs with reduced budgets struggling to thrive, especially in the Heineken Champions Cup. A debate across the recent pool stages was that the salary cap in England, which has come down from £6.4million to £5m, would affect the competitiveness of the Premiership. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In the end, five of the English participants in the 24-team Champions Cup made it through to the round-of-16 stage, but Northampton, Bath and Wasps were the three teams to struggle and fail to qualify.  

When the cap was at its highest level, England dominated the honours list with Saracens winning three titles and Exeter one in five seasons. However, a force of old struck back last term as Toulouse secured a record fifth title in an all-French final and with seven French clubs and four Irish now through to this year’s knockout stage, it will be tough for an English club to go on and become champions.  

Video Spacer

ASX Sports Fantasy Rugby | A new generation of fantasy rugby is here with apps for iOS and Android!

Video Spacer

ASX Sports Fantasy Rugby | A new generation of fantasy rugby is here with apps for iOS and Android!

Lam, though, has no time for excuses that allege that a reduced budget hinders a team’s competitiveness. Bristol argued against the Premiership salary cap reduction, their perspective being that the financially worried English clubs who voted for the cut should have been living within their means in the first place.   

The reduction, however, hasn’t dimmed Lam’s ambition and no sooner was the topic of budget mentioned at his weekly media briefing, the coach tilted his laptop screen away from his face to instead show the framed piece of memorabilia taking pride of place on his office wall  – a jersey, some pictures and a medal celebrating the 2016 PRO12 title win by Irish minnows Connacht, the team Lam coached before taking over at Bristol the following year.

Related

“It’s a reminder that Connacht at that time had the smallest budget of all the teams in the northern hemisphere but if you get everyone working together it is not impossible,” explained Lam with a smile reflective of the fondness he still holds for his incredibly successful spell in Ireland after his time at the Super Rugby Blues in Auckland was ended prematurely. 

“It’s difficult but you can get it done. You will always have a team that has got more money, you are always going to have a team that has got more resources, but it is the emphasis on the vision, emphasis on clarity of role, on game culture leadership. With everyone working together, you can still achieve. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sure, it makes it difficult that the Premiership teams are going up against the French teams who have huge money. Same with some of the teams in the URC (the latest name for the old PRO12). But it is about a fighter or a victim mindset, it’s about understanding that and just worrying about what we can do and we can achieve a lot. 

“That is a question every year but I still believe it [Premiership clubs in Europe] can be competitive. Not everything is on an even playing field but that is my life in sport and all the teams I have been to, you always have got someone who has got more. You don’t worry about that, you just worry about making sure you are the best version of yourself so you can compete.” 

Jogging his memory back to his four-year stay in Ireland, Lam added about Connacht’s budget: “We were miles behind the other three provinces and that was fine and that is what I was saying about the Premiership, that is why we [Bristol] didn’t agree with lowering the salary cap. 

“If the salary cap is at £7m or £6.4m and you have only got £5m, well only spend £5m. That is the responsibility of the DoRs, the CEOs, the boards to make sure they don’t send their club into bankruptcy. In Ireland, Leinster had so much money, Ulster and Munster had so much more money. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“We [Connacht] had this amount of money and it was not a problem that this was what we got. We could have spent possibly up what Leinster had but we didn’t have that money, so you just spend within your means and you focus on what you can be as a quality rugby team. 

“The whole system in Ireland, unless you are over there you won’t really understand it. Even in Connacht. The schools system, directors of rugby in some of these schools get paid a lot more than some of the provincial coaches, so they have got some quality setups in these schools in Dublin which means that a lot of the players in Leinster get well-coached.

“Great resources. They are getting developed real fast and the spin-off is they all come through and they are in the Leinster catchment, which is great and you have seen it. It is just a conveyor belt of players coming through and even when we were at Connacht, because they can’t take all of them, we picked up a few. They have got a great setup there in Leinster and ultimately in Ireland.” 

Back to the office wall in Bristol: what else has Lam got hanging on it? “There are a few other bits and pieces, some from my playing days and stuff, but the Connacht one is there to remind me and everybody that it is not about the resources. It’s about getting everybody on the same page and reminding people that money is not everything. It’s about key things and getting them right.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Pieter-Steph du Toit, The Malmesbury Missile, in conversation with Big Jim

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 3 hours ago
Why European rugby is in danger of death-by-monopoly

While all this is going on… I’ve been thinking more about the NFL draft system and how to make the commercial elements of the game more sustainable for SA teams who precariously live on the fringe of these developments. SA teams play in Europe now, and are welcome, because there’s a novelty to it. SA certainly doesn’t bring the bucks (like a Japan would to SR) but they bring eyes to it. But if they don’t perform (because they don’t have the money like the big clubs) - it’s easy come easy go… I think there is an element of strategic drafting going on in SA. Where the best players (assets) are sort of distributed amongst the major teams. It’s why we’re seeing Moodie at the Bulls for example and not at his homegrown Western Province. 20-30 years ago, it was all about playing for your province of birth. That has clearly changed in the modern era. Maybe Moodie couldn’t stay in the cape because at the time the Stormers were broke? Or had too many good players to fit him in? Kistchoff’s sabbatical to Ireland and back had financial benefits. Now they can afford him again (I would guess). What I am getting at is - I think SA Rugby needs to have a very strong strategy around how teams equitably share good youth players out of the youth structures. That is SA’s strong point - a good supply of good players out of our schools and varsities. It doesn’t need to be the spectacle we see out of the states, but a system where SA teams and SA rugby decide on where to draft youth, how to fund this and how to make it that it were possible for a team like the Cheetahs (for example) to end up with a team of young stars and win! This is the investment and thinking that needs to be happening at grassroots to sustain the monster meanwhile being created at the top.

64 Go to comments
J
Jon 6 hours ago
Why European rugby is in danger of death-by-monopoly

Wow, have to go but can’t leave without saying these thoughts. And carlos might jump in here, but going through the repercussions I had the thought that sole nation representatives would see this tournament as a huge boon. The prestige alone by provide a huge incentive for nations like Argentina to place a fully international club side into one of these tournaments (namely Super Rugby). I don’t know about the money side but if a team like the Jaguares was on the fence about returning I could see this entry as deciding the deal (at least for make up of that side with its eligibility criteria etc). Same goes for Fiji, and the Drua, if there can be found money to invest in bringing more internationals into the side. It’s great work from those involved in European rugby to sacrifice their finals, or more accurately, to open there finals upto 8 other world teams. It creates a great niche and can be used by other parties to add further improvements to the game. Huge change from the way things in the past have stalled. I did not even know that about the French game. Can we not then, for all the posters out there that don’t want to follow NZ and make the game more aerobic, now make a clear decision around with more injuries occur the more tired an athlete is? If France doesn’t have less injuries, then that puts paid to that complaint, and we just need to find out if it is actually more dangerous having ‘bigger’ athletes or not. How long have they had this rule?

64 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Ben Youngs: 'The job description of a 9 has changed. Gibson-Park and Dupont are leading the evolution' Ben Youngs: 'The job description of a 9 has changed. Gibson-Park and Dupont are leading the evolution'
Search