Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Stirling Mortlock concerned about Wallabies following scratchy Samoa win

By Online Editors
Stirling Mortlock. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Former Wallabies captain Stirling Mortlock is concerned about Australia’s “very one-dimensional” attack in their 34-15 victory against Samoa.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mortlock, who skippered the Wallabies to a quarter-final exit at the 2007 World Cup, watched on from the stands at Bankwest Stadium in Sydney as his former team survived a minor scare from the Pacific side in their final World Cup warm-up match.

Despite scoring six tries in the 19-point victory, Mortlock felt Australia’s attacking strategy against the world’s 16th-ranked side lacked spark and variation compared to matches from earlier this year.

“I wasn’t that impressed with the Samoa performance,” Mortlock told the Sydney Morning Herald.

“In the first half it was a pretty decent performance but we didn’t assert ourselves in the second half. What I wasn’t impressed with was in attack we looked very one-dimensional.

“Perhaps that was an extension of the fact the guys have been on tour away and have had a pretty heavy workload during camp.

“When you do that you’re not as polished and likely to chance your arm but certainly most of the test matches this year we’ve seen the Wallabies attack really throw caution to the wind with ball in hand and use a lot of width and lots of passes.

“Whereas against Samoa I didn’t sense that was the case. That was my disappointment, I just found it hard to follow to be frank.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“There was hardly any time to give them a good lead-up into the World Cup and that was their last crack at it and it seemed to be a little different to the few matches before.

“They’ve changed their attack dramatically this year, so in my view every game was critical to go in the right direction to improve it or reinforce that new style. Yet to me it certainly didn’t look like that’s what they were doing against Samoa.

“It felt like it was a bit of a waste.”

Mortlock’s criticism came with a glimmer of hope, as the 42-year-old believed he had seen enough from the Wallabies’ 47-26 Bledisloe Cup thumping of the All Blacks in Perth to suggest that the Australians could go far in the World Cup should they string together some commanding performances.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In 2015 I was pretty optimistic leading into it but this year I wasn’t until I went across to Perth,” he said.

“I can definitely see this Wallaby outfit surprising a lot of people with a strong championship-style performance in the World Cup.

“That’s why I’m a little bit frustrated by the Samoan performance. I expected to see really expansive attack and a different attack to what we’ve seen to the last few years. I didn’t think it was as high-risk high reward as we’ve seen in Tests before that.

“I’m hoping we get our set-piece right, which we’ve done in patches, and if we do that I think we can go deep into this tournament again with that attack.”

The Wallabies kick-off their World Cup campaign against Fiji in Sapporo on September 21.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 14 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Israel Dagg blasts Crusaders, weighs in on Rob Penney's future Dagg blasts Crusaders, debates Penney's future
Search