Northern | US

Reports of the death of Australian rugby may have been greatly exaggerated


Getty Images
Comments
Comment

Is rugby really the 26th most played sport in Australia, or are Roy Morgan’s latest figures ‘fake news’?

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby is less popular in Australia than ballroom dancing, ten pin bowling and darts, according to participation figures released by research company Roy Morgan.

The survey of 14,330 Australians placed rugby 26th on the list of sports, with an estimated 55,000 participants nationwide in 2016. That number is down a spectacular 63% from the company’s 2001 figure of 148,000.

After a month of poor Super Rugby results for Australian franchises, and with the SANZAAR axe already hovering over one of the Force, Rebels or Brumbies, the figures don’t look good.

But are they accurate?

Nowhere near, says Australian rugby columnist Brett McKay, who labelled the report “fake news” on The Roar this morning.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

According to one of McKay’s sources, in 2016 there were 33,000 active rugby players across all formats in Queensland alone – and that’s just the girls and women.

“Apparently there are only 18,000 other rugby players Australia-wide,” McKay wrote. “That is, all males in Queensland, and all players in total in NSW, the ACT, Victoria, and Western Australia. And everywhere else in between.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Roy Morgan’s figure of 55,000 is miles off recent participation numbers provided by the ARU (267,463 in 2015) and the Australian Sports Commission (199,000 in 2016).

Something doesn’t quite add up. While the sensational figures have been quickly lapped up by international media, it would probably pay to take them with a rather large grain of salt.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 1 hour ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close