Ref Watch: A touchy subject
From a shortlist of two it was experienced South African whistler Jaco Peyper rather than sole France 2007 survivor Wayne Barnes who – depending on your view – was given the honour or drew the short straw to get the 2023 World Cup underway.
With the eyes of the rugby-watching world on this seismic encounter between France and New Zealand at the Stade de France, World Rugby can be forgiven for the most risk-averse opening night refereeing selection possible and Peyper rewarded their faith with a solid display.
I couldn’t help but wonder if England’s players were watching as two of the world’s leading four sides went through 80 minutes without a hint of a high tackle – perhaps it isn’t as hard as it seems Owen?
The competition needed an opening night free from controversy when the players made the headlines – and it got it. With one game down and 47 to go Peyper and his team set benchmarks in certain key areas – let’s hope those who follow adopt the same standards.
TMO Relationship
I was massively impressed by the refined approach which saw a lot less time spent analysing slo-mo replays and the referee encouraged to back his onfield judgement.
At the same time it was also clear that English TMO Tom Foley had Peyper’s back. For instance, in the 12th minute Peyper and TJ Christophe Ridley were preparing for a lineout when the ref suddenly without warning marched infield and awarded France a penalty for the New Zealand kick chase making contact in the air prior to the ball going into touch. This call clearly came from Foley.
Similarly, the collision that followed Peato Mauvaka’s chip-and-chase drew huge amounts of whistles from the home crowd and it was apparent from Peyper’s slight hesitation that he was taking advice from his TMO behind the scenes before restarting play with a goal-line drop out.
There was also a nice display of teamwork between the officials early in the second quarter. Following a period of advantage Foley quietly moved Peyper ten metres infield towards the home posts to ensure the original mark was awarded at the correct point – from where New Zealand had a simple kick at goal.
The speed of Foley’s input to rule out a possible Damian Penaud try early in the second half was especially taking – two replays and a decision which came before the players had time to draw breath.
It seemed there was a shift back to the referee being the primary decision maker and the TMO being a reference point unless there was a glaring mistake which required intervention.
Cynics may suggest the lack of TV replays from a French director who seemingly preferred arty shots of the crowd to the rugby helped in this respect since the social media soapbox mob were left without ammunition.
But either way it certainly improved the flow of the game and enhanced the spectacle without opening the door for any major officiating mishaps. For me Ben Kay summarised it well in commentary: “The referee backed his onfield judgement which is exactly what we want to see.”
Scrum Penalties
The overall penalty count finished 4-12 in France’s favour with les Bleus only being pinged once in the whole second half.
New Zealand prop Ethan de Groot was twice singled out by Peyper in the scrum with both penalties being good examples of how referees think.
Contrary to what some would have you believe refereeing the scrum isn’t all guesswork (usually!) and the officials use available visual clues to work out which prop is more under pressure.
In de Groot’s case his leg position was the ‘tell’ since to withstand the weight being (legally) brought to bear by the enormous Uini Atonio he had them fully straightened behind him. New Zealand’s loose head was therefore left badly unbalanced and quickly went to ground when the French tight head cleverly shifted his body position.
Back to the Future
Was I alone in doing a double take when French no.8 Gregory Alldritt was called back for being in front of his team’s restart in the second quarter?
If Mr Peyper had gone on to award a free kick for scrum feeding we would all have needed to check if we were watching a rerun of the 1987 final between the same teams rather than the 2023 version.
Joking apart, with restarts now treated by coaches as a third set-piece, this crackdown – if indeed that was what we witnessed the opening stanza of – is a logical and welcome development. Watch this space…
When forwards is backwards
Freeze the picture at the instant that Anton Lienert-Brown throws a long pass in the direction of Mark Telea in the build-up to New Zealand’s second try and you will note that Peyper, the Kiwi no.12 and touch judge Christophe Ridley are positioned in a perfectly straight line.
There was therefore no way that the officials could miss a forward pass – and according to all the subsequent TV analysis (which included Maggie Alphonsi praising the play) their decision not to recall Telea’s touchdown was a correct one.
However, let your TV run a few frames forward and look where the ball lands – perhaps five metres in front of where it was thrown from.
Under the forward pass interpretation which introduced nuance around the direction in which the hands travel this is very probably not considered a forward pass.
But to a simple soul like me – and I suspect millions of occasional rugby fans watching on terrestrial TV – since it certainly didn’t go backwards what else can it be?
In the bunker
We had our first World Cup look at the bunker system in operation when Peyper despatched Will Jordan to the sidelines following a mistimed aerial challenge with the cross-arms signal that triggers a bunker TMO look at whether the incident merited a red rather than yellow card.
It took around three minutes for confirmation to arrive that due to the catcher landing on his side the degree of danger was low and ten minutes in the sinbin was therefore an appropriate sanction.
In summary another good development which speeds up the game – albeit we will all need to accept the inevitable (but in my view entirely acceptable) consequence that a straight red card will almost never now be shown.
Anorak corner
Full marks to the excellent Miles Harrison for his word-perfect description of the 71st minute incident that saw Thomas Ramos call a mark then take play inside the New Zealand 22 with a fine kick that landed flush on the touchline and therefore went directly into touch.
TJ Christophe Ridley was almost fooled and started to head back to the point where Ramos kicked the ball before realising (perhaps with Foley’s assistance) that since the mark was inside the French 22, the gain in territory should stand.
But it was dear old Miles who won the anorak-of-the-day award by then pointing out that in case any viewer was wondering a 50/22 cannot be awarded from a free kick – only from a kick made in open play.
Only you were wondering that, Miles!
Touch Judge Lesson Number One
When you start refereeing at your local society inevitably within a few months you get appointed to run touch for someone with a bit more experience, perhaps at a cup tie or at a midweek evening game.
Working with someone that has a few years under his or her belt is a great way to learn – and pre-match you are always briefed by the ref with a very short list of touch judging do’s and don’ts.
Top of the pile – without fail – is that you under no circumstances ever raise your flag behind the posts without first conferring with your fellow touch judge. Unless you both agree with a big nod of the head both flags stay down and the referee makes his/her own decision since anything else creates a possible flashpoint and looks awful.
Of course, if one of your touch judges was fast-tracked from being a professional player straight to the English Premiership he probably never spent the time learning this basic lesson while running the line at a junior club on a cold Sunday afternoon in November.
Since France were out of sight Karl Dickson’s faux pas following their second try was hardly noticed but imagine if it had been 15-all and a kick to win the game?
Comments on RugbyPass
Good summation Ned. Agree the Canes were out-muscled for once (except at the scrum!) by a focused Brumbies outfit. Tua deserves consideration for higher honors after the way he humbled Jordie and the Canes defense. Thankfully, his lack of eligibility for Oz keeps him from Joe’s plans. While I also agree the injuries affected the Canes performance, some players seemed to lack focus and intensity for this match. Perhaps after the Blues demolished the Brumbies, they thought it was going to be easy? A good reminder that any slip up in preparation can have a big affect on the result. Brumbies deserved that win.
1 Go to commentsKarl Dixon should never have been appointed this fixture, absolute disgrace, He’s not much of a referee anyway, didn't have the balls to send his mate care off
5 Go to commentsBrilliant article! Harry of 8/9
1 Go to comments‘UK athletes' have been in the NFL from the start.
1 Go to commentsIt’s going to be Scott Barrett. He’s the coaches mate and captain of a previously elite team. Ardie a great option but scooter has worked with the coach and Ardie still as big a leader as needed.
23 Go to commentsI commend Colin Scotts bio All Balls. He was the first Aussie to make it to NFL. But he was poached and did a full apprenticeship at the University of Hawaii. He was 130kgs surfed played 1st grade cricket etc. big guy by normal but not NFL standards and a top athlete. Even then the nfl were picking up Tongans and Samoans for their natural size and explosive power. They want explosive power not cardio from the big boys so a guy like Taniela Tupou would have been good if picked up young enough. He has fast twitch and they’d bulk the little lad up and give him something to do. soccer teams set up academies and look for Over Sara’s talent eg Messi was at Barcelona since a teenager and harry kewell went to Leeds as a teenager like 16 or something.
11 Go to commentsThe article alludes to the fact that this isn’t about picking a captain. But picking a great captain. So who would make for a great All Black captain - not just an obvious or safe shoo-in? I’m not sure Ardie’s the guy and Barret doesn’t stand out either.
23 Go to commentsI guess we may all agree on the fact, that the ABs and Boks are the two in contest for No 1 in rugby history (the triple-A sort of) …. the Wallabies, England and France are the next tier, with Ireland being the new kid in town (AA) …. in my view it makes little sense creating imaginary competitions (unless you have too much time to waste)
45 Go to commentsWhat a joke. Total joke and the pundits commentating, all of whom know a bit about the game, could barely disguise their contempt. Reaching for the card then pulling back when he realised a red card would carry further match suspensions is simply not his decision to make. A clear and obvious influence on the outcome of this match and indeed, the championship path.
5 Go to commentsI like the idea, in NZ the Ranfurly Shield and NPC coexist, both having their own bragging rights. The World Cup would be the pinnacle, but the competition and travels of these trophies would be interesting.
45 Go to commentsDon’t worry Sonny bill Williams leave that awkward situation about the curfew in the pass whoever it was it doesn’t matter its no big deal we back our All Blacks through the storm and the thunder until we see the Sun light again.
42 Go to commentsWho listens to this retard? He was a massive liability as a player but obviously a media sensation
42 Go to commentsI’m not surprised by such ‘virtue signalling’ by Sonny Boy. Butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth. He’s such a pious Islamic muppet, imo.
42 Go to commentsI’ve actually never heard of the guy (then I don’t watch League as it is boring). But if he is good enough.. then good luck to him. If not, well, he can always return to league.
2 Go to commentsIt is pretty clear that by almost any measure that NZ are a more successful rugby nation than South Africa. Quite aside from the distasteful events during the last RWC final. NZ lead SA in all significant measurements.
45 Go to commentsDickson went to his pocket for a card, saw who it was, changed his mind and spoke at length to TMO. One angle clearly shows Care diving over a Saints player to kill the ball. 1st yellow, reason given for not Red was player was falling backwards. He was only falling backwards after contact with Lawes. Graham try should have stood. Mitchell did not have both hands on the ball, ball went forward from a Saints boot dragging over it. 2 intentional knock-on's. One of which had an overlap on the outside. If Quins are happy to win by intentional foul play, then it does not say much for them. Would appear to be a bad day for Karl Dickson, also for the RFU in appointing a Ref who spent 8 years as a player at one of the clubs.
5 Go to commentsLet’s not forget about Ardie Savea just yet.
8 Go to commentsThe URC and the Euro Championscup can’t run at the same time, basically dilutes both competitions.
2 Go to comments“While Sotutu should start at No.8 for the All Blacks against England, but it’s only in that arena that he can prove just how good he really is.” And that my friends is where simply hasnt shone despite multiple opportunities. Even in this performance you can see what did him in in the test arena..he almost always still runs at the opposition almost ramrod upright making him easier to stop than it should be.
8 Go to commentsShould have been 0-0 and a message from SR CEO to both teams - “don’t worry about turning up next year”.
5 Go to comments