Northern | US

One World Cup team boss brands new scrum law change an 'impracticable, box-ticking exercise'


Crusaders' Owen Franks and Codie Taylor react at a 2019 Super Rugby final scrum (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

There has been widespread approval from players and former players after World Rugby recently outlawed ‘pre-loading’ in scrums.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, current USA head coach Gary Gold has raised a few questions about this decision. ‘Pre-loading’ is where front rows press their heads into the shoulders of the opposition between the ‘bind’ and ‘set’ calls in the scrum. 

This puts a huge amount of pressure on their necks and could have terrible consequences. From now on, a side that is caught doing this will be penalised. 

However, the former Springboks assistant coach has said on Twitter that it is “mechanically impossible” to implement this law change. 

The laws state that there should be space between the front rows before the scrum engages, but that there should also be a legal long bind between props. 

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

A long bind provides more stability in the scrum and makes it harder for props to manipulate the opposite player. Gold is effectively saying that ‘pre-loading’ is inevitable if props are to have a legal bind in the scrum. 

While Gold supports a lot of what World Rugby are doing, he has claimed this is “impracticable and a box-ticking exercise”. This is what he said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

The former Bath and Worcester Warriors coach also went on to raise another question, which relates to how this law change is enforced. 

‘Pre-loading’ is something that both sides do more or less simultaneously, and Gold has therefore questioned who the referee chooses to penalise. 

Already this looks like an area that may cause controversy among teams next season, where they may feel wrongly accused by officials and hard done by. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Rugby Law Review Group met recently in London to discuss these law variations, as the ultimate objective is always to make rugby safer. 

They were helped by international hookers Jamie George, Ken Owens, and Rory Best, who would have all provided input from a professional player’s perspective. 

There is no doubt that this new law will do away with a needless and dangerous aspect of the scrum, and while Gold will, of course, support the pursuit in making the game safer, he is simply highlighting the impracticality of this decision. 

The law will be implemented immediately, so it will not take long to see if Gold is right in branding this new law “mechanically impossible”. 

WATCH: Part one of the two-part RugbyPass documentary on the many adventures that fans experience in Japan at this year’s World Cup

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 34 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close