Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Nienaber's 'unique' comparison of England and France can be read two ways

By Josh Raisey
South Africa's head coach Jacques Nienaber (R) and South Africa's flanker Siya Kolisi hold a press conference in Presles, north of Paris, on October 19, 2023, ahead of the France 2023 Rugby World Cup semi-final against England. (Photo by Thomas SAMSON / AFP) (Photo by THOMAS SAMSON/AFP via Getty Images)

South Africa head coach Jacques Nienaber has said his side “know what’s coming” against England on Saturday in the World Cup semi-final after likening their tactics to France’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nienaber compared the kicking game of both sides this week, describing their style as “unique”. But while he said the Springboks know what’s coming at the Stade de France, the coach also noted it is about executing their game plan on the day.

This comparison can be read two ways. On one hand, there are not many better compliments in the game currently than being likened to France, who were ranked number two in the world last week. Though England have risen to number five in the world after making the semi-finals of the World Cup, the general consensus is that they are still well behind the top four in the world. But Nienaber’s comments show the tactical similarities they have with Les Bleus, although their execution of the tactics may be different.

Video Spacer

WATCH as South Africa’s Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus talks about the pitfalls of facing England in the World Cup semifinal

Video Spacer

WATCH as South Africa’s Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus talks about the pitfalls of facing England in the World Cup semifinal

On the other hand, comparing your upcoming opponents to the team you beat just a few days ago could actually be a warning to England from the Boks. While it is probably flattering for Steve Borthwick’s side to be held in the same conversation as France, particularly as Fabien Galthie’s side beat them 53-10 at Twickenham this year, Les Bleus did ultimately fall short against the world champions in the quarter-finals. France entered their match against the Springboks as slight favourites, while England enter as heavy underdogs, so this may well be Nienaber serving England a warning.

“Like the French, they have a unique kicking game, they are comfortable not playing with the ball,” Nienaber said after naming his South Africa squad for the semi-final.

“They like to strangle you, kick the ball in your half, apply the pressure and wait for you to make a mistake. From a tactical point of view, we know what’s coming and we just need to make sure we execute on the day.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks in the World Cup final The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks
Search