Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

News coming out of South Africa makes mockery of '30 cap policy'

Sale Sharks' Faf de Klerk

Rassie Erasmus can pick whoever he wants, regardless of where they are playing, that’s according to reports coming out of Johannesburg.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 30-Test cap policy is still officially in place, however, Erasmus has been allowed to select whoever he wants – even if the player playing his trade overseas and has no Test caps.

According to the South African media reports, the SA Rugby president Mark Alexander confirmed the news on Thursday in Johannesburg.

“Rassie has got a year to prepare the team, and in this, the last year [before the World Cup] he’s allowed to pick players locally and abroad,” Alexander told reporters.

“He’s been speaking to some players [overseas] and we’ve given him leeway to do that.”

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“He only has 18 Tests between now and the World Cup and he wants to give everyone an opportunity to be seen to make the Springbok team.

“There’s no limit on the number of players he can pick [from overseas].

“There’s an agreement for him to perform and we don’t want to limit him in that regard. He has access to the [overseas] players and can utilise them when and how he requires,”

ADVERTISEMENT

The lifting of the rule does open the door for Europe-based players like Juan de Jongh, Vincent Koch, Francois de Klerk, Cobus Reinach, Jan Serfontein, Willie le Roux and Ruan Ackerman.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 38 minutes ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

11 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search