Northern | US

'Nations Championship was a golden opportunity to grow the game internationally but is seemingly lost'


The haka, led by TJ Perenara, won't be seen in a Nations Championship after the proposed tournament was scrapped by World Rugby (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

New Zealand Rugby chairman Brent Impey has slammed what he has described as a lost opportunity after World Rugby conceded defeat on its World Rugby Nations Championship concept.

ADVERTISEMENT

In an interesting departure from New Zealand Rugby’s party line, which has merely said it is disappointed that the international rugby calendar has been officially scrapped, Impey, who is also Sanzaar’s chairman, said it was an opportunity wasted.

World Rugby’s world nations concept revolved around a promotion/relegation calendar which was aimed at the high-profile Six Nations and Rugby Championship sides but which most assumed would have hurt the ambitions of the Tier Two nations, including the Pacific Islands.

VIDEO

In a statement reported by the New Zealand Herald, the Sanzaar nations of Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa said that while they had some concerns over elements of what was presented, most notably promotion/relegation, they added through Impey: “The Nations Championship was a golden opportunity to grow the game internationally but is seemingly lost. 

“Sanzaar remains convinced that such a revamped international calendar is the right course of action supported by professional cross-border competitions such as Super Rugby and the various European premierships.”

It is thought that the Six Nations sides, in particular Italy and Scotland, had issues with the relegation side of the equation. Without it, the Pacific nations would have been locked out.

“All Sanzaar unions signed the letter of offer with World Rugby to continue negotiations,” Impey said. “Sanzaar has been consistent in its support of the concept as we believed that this was an important decision for the future of the world game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Furthermore, the ability to have promotion/relegation in both hemispheres as proposed by World Rugby is a principle position with which Sanzaar agreed. That would have created a meaningful pathway and aspirations for emerging nations.”

A major stumbling block was the ability of Tier Two nations, including those such as Fiji and Samoa, to force their way on to the top table, but Impey added: “While World Rugby has led discussions around the Nations Championship concept, Sanzaar and its member unions, have been in constant and positive dialogue with our broadcast partners to secure the future of Super Rugby and the Rugby Championship.”

New Zealand Rugby was far less crictical in a statement, saying, according to boss Steve Tew, who is in his final months in charge: “We want to acknowledge the tireless efforts and leadership from World Rugby to get the proposal to this point. Creating a new international competition was always going to be a challenging conversation for world rugby nations.

“The challenges have been complex and multi-faceted as we sought to find a model that balanced demands of fans, with the welfare of all players, growing the commercial strength of our competition and ensuring we were providing a pathway for other nations. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“While there were some serious issues to be resolved such as the varying positions on promotion/relegation, New Zealand Rugby remained committed to continuing dialogue to see if these could be overcome for the greater good of the game.”

WATCH: Why World Rugby has scrapped its Nations Championship plans

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 35 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close