Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Montpellier seeking compensation for Racing postponement

Racing 92 fans

Montpellier are seeking thousands of euros in compensation from French rugby chiefs for the postponement of last Saturday’s Top 14 clash with Racing 92.

ADVERTISEMENT

The National Rugby League (NRL) called off the clash at Altrad Stadium on the eve of the game amid talks over a proposed merger between Racing and Stade Francais.

Controversial plans for the two Paris clubs to join forces were scrapped on Sunday following a huge backlash, which included the threat of strike action from players and other protests.

Montpellier on Tuesday revealed that they will pursue a claim after being hit in the pocket as a result of the match against the champions not going ahead.

A club statement said: “Last Friday, we were forced by a unilateral decision of the NRL Bureau, at the request of Racing 92, not to play on Saturday night.

“Nevertheless, the referee asked us to be present at the time of the match as if the match were to take place.

“We are still challenging the rationale for the NRL decision, which we are still looking for, and we are now waiting for the position of the FFR [French Rugby Federation] as announced by Serge Simon yesterday morning: ‘The FFR considers the deferral decision inappropriate. As such, it has initiated a procedure for the review of this decision … and has maintained the official system of the match, the presence of the referees being able to note the absence of one of the teams’.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In any event, once the meeting between the President of the FFR and the NRL has taken place, the MHR will continue the actions essential to the defence of its rights and in particular the reimbursement of all the expenses incurred as well as the lost revenue which amounts to several hundred thousand euros.”

Stade’s match against Castres was also postponed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks in the World Cup final The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks
Search